Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 12;103(5):395–400. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002393

Table 2.

Summary statistics for the outcome variables DAR and DTABR between pre- and post- transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the index finger. The statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05) is highlighted with bold text.

DAR
n Mean 95% CI Mean Standard Deviation Median Min Max p-value
Stroke
 Pre-TENS 8 12.00 8.11 15.90 4.66 11.04 3.96 19.23
 Post-TENS 8 8.13 2.28 13.98 6.99 5.63 1.33 23.25
 Difference 8 3.87 0.78 6.96 3.70 4.49 −4.01 8.33 .0211
Control
 Pre-TENS 7 4.60 −0.27 9.47 5.26 2.20 0.05 13.88
 Post-TENS 7 2.54 0.48 4.61 2.23 3.48 0.00 5.17
 Difference 7 2.06 −1.33 5.44 3.66 0.90 −1.61 9.25 .1880
DTABR
Stroke
 Pre-TENS 8 4.15 3.07 5.22 1.28 3.75 2.26 6.29
 Post-TENS 8 2.96 1.77 4.15 1.42 2.44 1.28 5.58
 Difference 8 1.19 0.43 1.94 0.90 1.41 −0.80 2.24 .0074
Control
 Pre-TENS 7 1.50 0.11 2.90 1.51 1.08 0.02 3.95
 Post-TENS 7 1.03 0.22 1.85 0.88 0.93 0.01 2.11
 Difference 7 0.47 −0.32 1.26 0.85 0.28 −0.71 1.83 .1978