Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 29;5(4):101484. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101484

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Decitabine inhibits OXPHOS and the growth of ibrutinib-resistant MCL cells

(A) A schematic of ex vivo OMI experiments in Z-138 xenografts.

(B) Representative images of the fluorescence intensity of NAD(P)H and FAD in PBS (control, n = 3) and decitabine-treated mice (n = 3). Scale bar, 25 μm.

(C) Representative images of τm of FAD in control and decitabine-treated mice (left) and the quantification of FAD τm (right) at the single-cell level (control = 2,544 cells; decitabine = 1,743 cells). Bars represent mean ± SD. Different colors denote separate imaging days. Scale bar, 25μm.

(D) Single-cell quantifications of the lifetime of bound FAD (τ1) (ps, picosecond), the percentage of bound FAD (α1), the lifetime of free FAD (τ2), and the percentage of free FAD (α2).

(E) Representative of images of the optical redox ratio and the single-cell quantifications of optical redox ratio. Different colors denote separate imaging days. Scale bar, 25 μm. Mann-Whitney U test was used in (C)–(E).

(F) Z138 xenografts, the same as in (A). Red arrows indicate treatment start and end dates. Tumor dimensions were measured with calipers 3 times per week until endpoint, defined as any dimension exceeding 20 mm or mice becoming morbid.

(G) The effect of decitabine in MCL-7 PDXs.

(H) Bioluminescence images of MCL-4 PDX mice (left), growth curves presented as log10 of the average radiance of tumors (ps−1cm−2sr−1), with dashed line indicating that all of the mice are euthanized (center), and the probability of survival (right) are shown. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (2-way ANOVA). sr: steradian or square radian.