Table 3.

Definitions of six quality dimensions and an overall utility score used in our expert evaluation, along with their corresponding Likert systems

Evaluation Category	Definition	Likert System
Additions	The impression is not repetitive and does not include unnecessary findings	3: No additions 2: Moderate additions 1: Excessive additions
Omissions	The impression contains all important findings	3: No omissions 2: Moderate omissions 1: Significant omissions
Factual correctness	The impression accurately represents the findings and is devoid of factual errors	3: Correct 2: Partially correct 1: Substantially incorrect
Clarity and organization	The impression is unambiguous, grammatical, and well-organized	3: Good 2: Adequate 1: Poor
Interpretive and technical jargon	The impression provides appropriate interpretations of the findings and avoids using unnecessary radiologic jargon or details	3: Appropriate 2: Partially appropriate 1: Inappropriate
Recommendations	The recommendations for patient management, if applicable, are clinically valid	3: Appropriate 2: Partially appropriate 1: Inappropriate
Overall utility score	Given the impression as an initial draft, consider how many changes would you make to render it suitable for clinical use	5: Acceptable with no changes needed 4: Acceptable with minor changes needed 3: Acceptable with moderate changes needed 2: Unacceptable with significant changes needed 1: Unusable