Abstract
Oral health's impact on overall well-being highlights the importance of preventive measures through effective oral hygiene practices. Currently, there is growing recognition of the need for customized oral hygiene advice depending on the patient’s unique needs and circumstances. This narrative review addresses the gap in understanding the significance of personalized guidance through the proposal of the Personalized Oral Hygiene Advice Model (POHAM) as a comprehensive guide for oral health professionals. This model was developed to adapt to evolving patient demographics and diverse challenges, promoting a patient-centric and effective oral health approach. The POHAM comprises a flow chart of strategies from establishing a good rapport with patients, conducting comprehensive assessment through history-taking, psychosocial and technology proficiency evaluation, tailored education modules, and customized oral care product recommendations until the reassessment. These strategies aim to enhance patient engagement and adherence, as well as act as a guide for oral health professionals to use in the clinical setting before and during the course of oral treatment. Nevertheless, continued research, education, and technological advancements are needed to realize the full potential of personalized oral hygiene strategies, ensuring a transformative and sustainable oral healthcare landscape.
Keywords: oral care, oral health professionals, customized oral hygiene advice, personalized dentistry, oral health
Introduction and background
Introduction
Oral health plays a vital role in an individual’s overall well-being, influencing not only physical health but also psychological and social aspects of life. Preventing oral diseases through effective oral hygiene practices is a cornerstone of dental care [1,2]. As dentistry evolves, there is a growing recognition of the importance of tailoring oral hygiene advice (OHA) according to each patient's unique needs and circumstances. Despite an exhaustive list of information available on oral health, a gap exists in understanding the importance of providing personalized oral hygiene guidance. Standardized recommendations may not sufficiently address the variations in local and systemic factors influencing an individual’s oral health [3]. This narrative review highlights the importance of tailoring oral hygiene advice (OHA) to individual needs and circumstances, acknowledging the gap in understanding the significance of personalized guidance amidst the abundance of oral health information.
Oral health-related risk factors
Local and systemic risk factors significantly impact the development and progression of oral diseases [4]. Local risk factors can be divided into acquired or anatomical factors. The existence of plaque, calculus, overhanging restorative margins, and poorly contoured restorations are part of acquired local factors that may increase the risk of developing periodontal disease and caries. The anatomical local factors include the presence of enamel pearls, concavities, crowding of teeth, and furcation involvement. Systemic factors encompass variables, such as systemic diseases, socioeconomic status, genetics, age, and smoking [5]. These factors may affect oral health, particularly periodontium, in a generalized manner. Hence, it is important to address an individual need in terms of oral hygiene care, behavior, and lifestyle changes by carefully analyzing the risk factors and adopting a rather holistic approach to maintain good oral health.
The shift toward personalized healthcare
Current practices in the medical and dental fields have slowly shifted towards personalized care. Personalized medicine is the practice of using patients’ information with regard to the person’s genetic predisposition, proteins, and environment to prevent, diagnose, and treat any diseases [6,7]. Following the same theme, this form of medicine can be extended to dentistry in terms of oral health, which is considered as an essential part of overall well-being [8].
It is crucial that personalized oral hygiene advice (OHA) is integrated as part of the prevention stage in oral health therapy. In 2020, the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) came out with a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the treatment of periodontitis. They highlighted the importance of a personalized care plan that consisted of the delivery of adequate information to patients concerning their diagnosis, etiology, and causes of the diseases, risk factors involved, treatment options available, as well as risks and benefits of the treatment [9]. This plan can be modified along the treatment progress depending on the circumstances and changes in their oral and general health. All the information should be delivered in the first stage of the stepwise treatment approach recommended by the CPG, emphasizing guiding behavior change in terms of the removal of supragingival dental plaque such as toothbrushing, flossing, interdental cleaning and management of the risk factors involved.
The need for personalized oral hygiene advice
Despite the need for personalized OHA for each individual due to variations in the risk factors associated with the person, the literature lacks guidelines for oral health practitioners to apply this approach to their patients. Oral health professionals, such as dental specialists, general dental practitioners, dental hygienists, and other allied dental practitioners, are increasingly confronted with a diverse population of patients while presenting unique challenges and requirements individually. This situation called for a specific approach in delivering oral hygiene instructions to them, as emerging evidence has suggested that personalized OHA may enhance patient compliance, thereby contributing to better oral health outcomes [10]. Hence, this review aims to improve the personalization aspect of OHA delivery by offering a comprehensive guide to oral health professionals through the Personalized Oral Hygiene Advice Model (POHAM), as a one-size-fits-all approach is no longer relevant and may not yield optimal results to the patients.
Review
Factors influencing patients’ adherence to oral hygiene advice
Ensuring patients’ adherence to OHA is integral to the success of personalized care interventions. Before implementing a personalized oral hygiene care approach, oral health care practitioners should have an overview of the factors that may influence patients’ adherence to OHA so that it can facilitate them in delivering optimum oral hygiene advice to the patients.
According to a study on the factors influencing adherence to oral hygiene care, several factors were identified from focus group discussions conducted among periodontal patients [11]. The factors include inadequate knowledge of oral care from the patients, their behavior and past neglect concerning oral hygiene care, the relationship between dentists and patients, their cultural background and beliefs, as well as cost factors involving oral hygiene cleaning aids [12]. Another study came out with a model for patient compliance, and it was suggested that the relationship between patients and periodontists has a direct association with compliance [13]. The important characteristics of the clinician, specifically periodontists, include their communication and clinical skills, as well as good patient management. In terms of patient factors, oral health awareness, satisfaction, and experience from prior treatment all had a positive impact on their compliance. Other variables that may also influence their compliance with oral care include factors such as duration and complexity of treatment, age, gender, level of education, personality traits, and family and/or peer influence. Understanding these multifactorial challenges enables oral health professionals to develop personalized recommendations that align with the patient’s unique circumstances, thereby promoting sustainable adherence to oral hygiene advice delivered by their clinician.
Strategies for personalized oral hygiene advice
In response to the evolving field of dentistry, with the oral health prevention area in particular, we proposed POHAM for oral health professionals to adopt concerning the delivery of personalized oral health advice to patients (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Proposed model of strategies for POHAM by oral health professionals.
POHAM: Personalized Oral Hygiene Advice Model. Note: This image is the author's own creation.
Establish Good Rapport Through Effective Communication Skills
The first strategy is to establish a good rapport with the patient. Studies have suggested that the relationship between dentists and patients is vital to increasing patients’ adherence to OHA [11,13]. The building of mutual trust and clear communication between the clinician and patients plays a pivotal role in fostering comprehension and motivation [14] because, at the early stage of therapy, it is not uncommon for the patients to be anxious and uncertain about upcoming procedures [15]. The role of oral health professionals encompasses not only the prevention and treatment of the disease but also making sure that patients understand the causes and risk factors involved in the disease [9]. This can only be achieved by having essential skills in communication such as listening well, the ability to use easy and non-jargon words, being able to comfort and reassure patients with dental anxiety, and managing to deliver and promote behavior changes [16]. Clinicians can start a small talk with the patients before embarking on full dentist mode to avoid a threatening environment, as sometimes the mere presence of the dental office can trigger anxiety in the patients [15]. This approach will allow them to become slowly comfortable and willing to share the details of their related information, thereby facilitating the development of customized oral health therapy in general and OHA in particular for the patients.
Comprehensive Patient Assessment
Prior to formulating a personalized care plan for a patient, it is imperative to conduct a comprehensive assessment of their overall risk profile, encompassing personal details, medical and dental histories, social and lifestyle factors, dietary habits, socioeconomic status, cultural beliefs, and anxiety levels [17]. This assessment commences upon the patient’s arrival at the dental clinic and continues into the surgical room, involving the evaluation of their gaits, physical capabilities, emotional state, and whether they are accompanied or alone. Additionally, when the patient is engaging in informal conversations with dental staff and oral health professionals, it will allow the evaluation of the patient’s ability to comprehend verbal information and assess their expectations regarding the visit and dental treatment in general [16]. Such an approach facilitates the delivery of varying levels of care and support, recognizing that different demographic groups may necessitate distinct approaches for oral health assessment and treatment planning.
As part of patient evaluation, psychosocial assessment is also important to address. Psychosocial is a term that comprises the states of an individual's mental, social, emotional, and spiritual health [18]. Recognizing the impact of emotional and psychological factors allows oral health professionals to implement strategies that resonate with individual patients, ultimately enhancing their adherence to personalized OHA. Anxiety can have some effects on the cognitive functions of a person [19,20]. In this condition, patients may not have the ability to concentrate and digest the information delivered by their oral health professionals, depending on whether they are in ‘high fear’ or ‘low fear’ groups [21]. The OHA delivered without recognizing and addressing the patient’s psychosocial state might be ineffective as they cannot absorb and retain the much-needed information. Studies found that patients often fail to remember correctly the information delivered by their healthcare practitioners, up to 40-80% of the time [22,23]. Nevertheless, oral health professionals can try the approach of gradual education. The OHA should be broken down into small and manageable steps. Information should be provided gradually, allowing patients to process and ask questions at their own pace so that they can retain as much information as possible per visit. It is pertinent to provide positive reinforcement to the patients, as it helps to build their confidence and reduce anxiety about oral care [24]. Dental professionals should acknowledge the patient’s feelings [25], respect their autonomy while simultaneously involving them in the decision-making regarding their oral health, as well as allow them to set the pace and take breaks if needed.
Another important factor that needs to be evaluated is technology proficiency evaluation. It is without doubt that the world has become more advanced in terms of technology and artificial intelligence, and this does not exclude the dental field [26]. Depending on the patient's demographic status, their proficiency in the technology might differ. By evaluating this area, oral health professionals can interact with patients accordingly and guide them on how to use technology to empower themselves by taking an active role in their oral health care [27]. The use of smartphones, apps, online platforms, and digital tools such as smart toothbrushes [28] or virtual reality [29] can provide personalized oral hygiene plans through telehealth, remote monitoring, reminders, and access to educational resources that can be used by the patients to reach at their convenience [30].
Tailored Education Modules
All the information extracted from the patients should be carefully evaluated because each factor can become part of the contributing/risk factor for developing any oral diseases, with periodontal diseases and caries being the most common oral health problems [31]. For example, age and physical abilities are some of the factors that are critical for oral health professionals to be mindful of, due to the differences in the formulation of OHA. Even in the same age groups, patients with weak or paralyzed limbs due to a history of stroke need a specific and customized OHA that suits their conditions [32]. Commonly, the instructions to the elderly groups might have more emphasis on the hygiene of their remaining teeth, prevention of periodontal diseases, and care of the prosthesis inside the oral cavity, while OHA for toddlers and preschoolers should be focused on taking care of their deciduous teeth and the importance of erupting permanent dentition. These differences called for customization of OHA in terms of words to be used, the way of delivering the information, and different product recommendations. Another factor that should also be highlighted is the socioeconomic factor. Patients with financial difficulties might not be able to afford various dental cleaning aids in the market even though they need them to improve their oral hygiene [12]. Hence, oral health professionals must acknowledge this issue and try to accommodate the patients by formulating a unique OHA depending on their circumstances and attempting to modify the current oral hygiene technique instead of hastily introducing various dental cleaning aids to them [33]. Tailoring advice to align with patients’ preferences and cultural backgrounds fosters a sense of ownership and empowerment, promoting a positive attitude toward oral health maintenance.
Customized Oral Hygiene Care Product Recommendations
Each patient presents with a different kind of oral manifestation, and a standard oral health care plan may be inadequate. Based on a thorough assessment and discussion, each product should be customized accordingly, depending on the patient’s status. The recommendations by oral health professionals can comprise different types of toothbrushes, toothpaste, mouthwash, and/or interdental cleaning aids [34]. All these dental cleaning aids facilitate the mechanical removal and disruption of dental plaque, but depending on the techniques and products used by the patients, they can be either effective or ineffective [35]. As a result, it is through recommendations and guidance by professionals that patients can decide which product suits them most. For the toothbrush, it is important to consider the suitability of the patient's oral hygiene method by looking at the handle, the size of the toothbrush heads, and the bristles, as well as the use of a powered or manual toothbrush [36].
Other types of toothbrushes, such as interdental brushes and compact-tufted brushes, should also be tailored according to the patient's needs. The use of interdental brushes is commonly emphasized by dental professionals to be used by patients with reduced periodontium, as this will facilitate the removal of interdental plaque that cannot be accessed by the normal toothbrush. However, the sizes of the interdental brushes used should be customized depending on the space of the interproximal area to allow optimum mechanical removal of dental plaque [35,37].
As for the dentifrices, their mechanism of action to aid in oral hygiene care depends on the active ingredients set by the manufacturers. Each active ingredient possesses different properties, such as an anti-caries agent by calcium chloride-based fluoride [38], an anti-calculus agent by pyrophosphate and zinc citrate [39], or a desensitizing agent by potassium nitrate and strontium chloride [40]. The same thing also applies to the need for the use of mouth rinses by patients, depending on ingredients such as chlorhexidine [41], chlorhexidine combined with fluoride [42], or essential oils [43]. These are only some of the examples of dentifrices and mouth rinses available from abundant other products that are available in the markets, depending on their active ingredients. By analyzing the patient’s needs and circumstances, oral health professionals should outweigh the risks and benefits of each product available.
Periodic Reassessment and Readjustment
After completion of the POHAM, patients should be regularly assessed regarding their oral health status, and any adjustments can be made based on changes in their medical status, psychosocial factors, and/or lifestyles [9]. A personalized plan should evolve with the patient's changing needs over time, and if there are any challenges encountered upon delivery of OHA, oral health professionals should review back on the POHAM and go through any missed steps and sequences that might be important in the success of OHA delivery.
Conclusions
In summary, this review underlines the important shift towards personalized oral hygiene advice, emphasizing the need to tailor recommendations to individual patients. The proposed Personalized Oral Hygiene Advice Model (POHAM) is a novel approach that integrates comprehensive assessments while offering a dynamic approach for oral health professionals to use in the clinical setting. This model can be utilized as a guide to deliver OHA to patients and facilitate the improvement in patient engagement, adherence, and eventually overall oral health outcomes. As per current evidence, continued research, education, and technological advancements are crucial in realizing the potential of personalized strategies, fostering a more patient-centered, and effective oral health approach.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledged using the Large Language Model (LLM); ChatGPT version 3.5 at https://chat.openai.com/ to brainstorm the idea for background research and the drafting stage of the writing process.
There is a plan to copyright the Personalized Oral Hygiene Advice Model.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Nusaibah S. Nordin, Haslina Taib
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Nusaibah S. Nordin, Haslina Taib
Drafting of the manuscript: Nusaibah S. Nordin, Haslina Taib
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Nusaibah S. Nordin, Haslina Taib
Supervision: Haslina Taib
References
- 1.Principles in prevention of periodontal diseases: consensus report of group 1 of the 11th European Workshop on Periodontology on effective prevention of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Tonetti MS, Eickholz P, Loos BG, et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:5–11. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Association of stress, salivary cortisol, and chronic periodontitis: a clinico-biochemical study. Vishnu TO, Vijay KC, Sreenivas N. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:299–304. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_289_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scope, competences, learning outcomes and methods of periodontal education within the undergraduate dental curriculum: a consensus report of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontal Education-position paper 2 and consensus view 2. Sanz M, Meyle J. Eur J Dent Educ. 2010;14:25–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.British Society of Periodontology. Gillingham: Henry Schein Dental; 2016. The Good Practitioner’s Guide to Periodontology. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Risk factors for periodontitis. Van Dyke TE, Sheilesh D. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15736889/ J Int Acad Periodontol. 2005;7:3–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.National Cancer Institute. Definition of personalized medicine. [ Feb; 2024 ]. 2024. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/personalized-medicine. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/personalized-medicine.
- 7.The faces of personalized medicine: a framework for understanding its meaning and scope. Redekop WK, Mladsi D. Value Health. 2013;16:4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dentistry in an era of personalized medicine. Samaranayake L. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:161–162. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Treatment of stage I-III periodontitis: the EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M, et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:4–60. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Customized oral hygiene therapy: a personalized approach. Bhaskar V, Mccomas M, Wei C, Wang J. J Dent Oral Disord Ther. 2016;4:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Exploring factors influencing adherence to oral hygiene care among periodontal patients: a pilot study. Badiah B, Kang PL, Hor WS, Razali M, Dom TN. https://www.academia.edu/65848619/Exploring_factors_influencing_adherence_to_oral_hygiene_care_among_periodontal_patients_a_pilot_study Sains Malays. 2013;42:13–17. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Factors influencing compliance with oral hygiene practices among upper primary school children at Eldoret Town in Uasin Gishu county, Kenya. Mudola JM, Nyangena E, Muchee T. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/abstract/factors-influencing-compliance-with-oral-hygiene-practices-among-upper-primary-school-children-at-eldoret-town-in-uasin--31177.html J Nurs Care. 2015;1:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Influence of various factors on patient compliance after periodontal therapy: a pilot study. Shah R, Thomas R, Bhandari S, Mehta DS. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29386801/ J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21:50–54. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_254_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Communication skills of the clinician and patient motivation in dental practice. Buduneli N. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2020;7:202–207. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Current approaches in managing dental anxiety: a narrative review. Kweh TJ, Lim GS. https://jummec.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/23070 J Health Transl Med. 2020;23:55–60. [Google Scholar]
- 16.The importance of communication in dentistry. Waylen A. Dent Update. 2017;44:774–780. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Dundee: Dundee Dental Education Center; 2011. Oral Health Assessment and Review: Guidance in Brief. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Psychosocial factors, dentist-patient relationships, and oral health-related quality of life: a structural equation modelling. Song Y, Luzzi L, Brennan D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023;21:130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02214-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies. Robinson OJ, Vytal K, Cornwell BR, Grillon C. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Difficulty concentrating in generalized anxiety disorder: an evaluation of incremental utility and relationship to worry. Hallion LS, Steinman SA, Kusmierski SN. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;53:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Psychosocial consequences of dental fear and anxiety. Locker D. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:144–151. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Patients' memory for medical information. Kessels RP. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:219–222. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.5.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Remembering what the doctor said: organization and adults' memory for medical information. McGuire LC. Exp Aging Res. 1996;22:403–428. doi: 10.1080/03610739608254020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Skills, knowledge, and implementation of techniques for behavioral guidance in adults with a fear of dentistry. Barbi W, Raj V, Askari M, Toshi T, Gopalakrishnan D, Kumari K, Rangari P. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:1462–1465. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_253_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Better understanding your patient from a psychological perspective: early identification of problem behaviors affecting the dental office. Linda C, Lori R, Craig AP. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002;30:512–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.WHO. Improving oral health through use of digital technology. [ Feb; 2024 ]. 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-09-2021-improving-oral-health-through-use-of-digital-technology. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-09-2021-improving-oral-health-through-use-of-digital-technology.
- 27.Development of an intervention tool for precision oral self-care: personalized and evidence-based practice for patients with periodontal disease. Chang WJ, Lo SY, Kuo CL, Wang YL, Hsiao HC. PLoS One. 2019;14:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Effectiveness of an oral health education program using a smart toothbrush with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology in children. Lee J, Lee T, Jung HI, Park W, Song JS. Children (Basel) 2023;10:429. doi: 10.3390/children10030429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Virtual reality in oral hygiene instruction: an immersive approach. Genaro LE, Marconato JV, Hanai D, Pawloski CLG, de Oliveira Capote TS. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sci. 2022;24:177–187. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Methods of delivering oral hygiene instructions among orthodontic patients: the past, current and future. Dhanaraju DA, Ahmad NS, Yahya NA, Abdullah AA. Malays J Health Sci. 2023;21:47–59. [Google Scholar]
- 31.WHO: Oral health. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2024. https://www.who.int/health-topics/oral-health https://www.who.int/health-topics/oral-health
- 32.Periodontal treatment in patients with learning disabilities part 1: prevention. Shazia K, Chris D. Dent Update. 2017;44:114–130. doi: 10.12968/denu.2017.44.3.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Promoting behavioural changes to improve oral hygiene in patients with periodontal diseases: a systematic review. Carra MC, Detzen L, Kitzmann J, Woelber JP, Ramseier CA, Bouchard P. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:72–89. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.The effectiveness of an individually tailored oral health educational programme on oral hygiene behaviour in patients with periodontal disease: a blinded randomized-controlled clinical trial (one-year follow-up) Jönsson B, Ohrn K, Oscarson N, Lindberg P. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:1025–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oral hygiene measures and promotion: review and considerations. Choo A, Delac DM, Messer LB. Aust Dent J. 2001;46:166–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Toothbrush, its design and modifications: an overview. Mehta S, Vyaasini CVS, Jindal L, Sharma V, Jasuja T. J Curr Med Res Opinion. 2020;3:570–578. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cepillos interdentales, de la teoría a la práctica. revisión de literatura e indicaciones clínicas. Asquino N, Villarnobo F. Odontoestomatologia. 2019;21:46–53. [Google Scholar]
- 38.The anti-caries efficacy of calcium carbonate-based fluoride toothpastes. Lynch RJ, ten Cate JM. Int Dent J. 2005;55:175–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Supragingival calculus and periodontal disease. Davies RM, Ellwood RP, Volpe AR, Petrone ME. Periodontol 2000. 1997;15:74–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.An investigation of the effect of a desensitizing dentifrice on dentinal tubules in vitro and in vivo. Topbaşi B, Türkmen C, Günday M. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9643257/ Quintessence Int. 1998;29:197–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.A review of chlorhexidine and its use in special populations. Al‐Tannir MA, Goodman HS. Spec Care Dentist. 1994;14:116–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1994.tb01116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Effect of a combined chlorhexidine and NaF mouthrinse: an in vivo human caries model study. Ullsfoss BN, Ogaard B, Arends J, Ruben J, Rölla G, Afseth J. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:109–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.The effects of essential oil mouthrinses with or without alcohol on plaque and gingivitis: a randomized controlled clinical study. Lynch MC, Cortelli SC, McGuire JA, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0454-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]