Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 19;7(4):e247480. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7480

Figure 3. Adjusted Proportion of Respondents Recommending Placing Central Access From Logistic Regression for Cases 7 to 10.

Figure 3.

Patients in these cases were receiving norepinephrine through an 18-gauge peripheral venous catheter (PIV; location excluded the antecubital fossa). Respondents were asked if they would continue the vasopressor peripherally or place central access (ie, a temporary central line or peripherally inserted central catheter). Error bars denote 95% CIs. Case 7 was a 55-year-old female patient with cholecystitis; case 8 was a 70-year-old male patient with pneumonia; case 9 was a 65-year-old female patient with urosepsis; and case 10 was a 60-year-old male with cellulitis.

aIndicates P < .001.