Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;108(12):3260–3271. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad315

Table 1.

Patient and tumor characteristics for the discovery set at the time of sample collection

Cases Controls#1 Controls#2
n 14 28 14
Sex, n (%)
 Male 6 (43) 13 (46) 7 (50)
 Female 8 (57) 15 (54) 7 (50)
Age (median, IQR) 52.5 (41.8-60) 39.5 (28.5-58) 29.5 (22-38.5)
BMI (median, IQR)a 26 (22.8-32.3) 26 (23-36) 23 (20.5-24.5)
Collection site, n (%)
 MDACC 5 (36) 3 (11) 1 (7)
 NIH-NIDDK 5 (36) 0 (0) 1 (7)
 UMCU 4 (29) 25 (89) 12 (86)
 PanNET 13b 28
Prior dpNET surgery, n (%) 7 (50) 1 (4)
Size largest PanNET resected
 ≤20 mm 2
 >20 mm 3 1
 N/A (only duodenal/lymph node) 2
Size of largest PanNET, n (%) (in situ at sample collection) 12 (4-29) 11 (6-23)
 <20 mm 11 (79) 26 (93)
 ≥20 mm 2 (14) 2 (7)
Insulinoma, n (%)c
 No 13 (93) 27 (96) 14 (100)
 Yes 1 (7)
 Suspected 1 (4%)
Gastrinoma, n (%)d
 No 4 (29) 26 (93) 14 (100)
 Yes 7 (50)
 Suspected
 Unknown 3 (21) 2 (7)
Gastrin pg/mL (median, IQR)e 351 (151-1448) 75 (55-145) 57.5 (48.8-80)
Other function in PanNETf 1 (VIP) 0
Liver metastasis, origin, n (%)
 PanNET 10 (71)
 Gastrinoma 2 (14)
 PanNET or gastrinoma 2 (14)
Liver metastasis, n (%)
 1 6 (43)
 2 or 3 3 (21)
 More than 3 5 (36)
Size largest liver metastasis in mm (median, IQR) 11 (8.5-14)
Distant metastases outside liver, n (%) 1 (7)
Systemic or liver-directed therapy, n (%)
 None 10 (71) 28 (100%) 14 (100%)
 Previousg 3 (21)
 On active treatmenth 1 (7)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; dpNET, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; IQR, interquartile range; MDACC, MD Anderson Cancer Center; N/A, not applicable; NIH-NIDDK, National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; PanNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; UMCU, University Medical Center Utrecht; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide.

a BMI data was not available for 10 control subjects.

b One case had total or partial pancreatectomy but presented with dpNET-related liver metastasis at the time of blood collection.

c Insulinoma was defined as a positive supervised fast or symptoms confirmed by low plasma glucose, inappropriate insulin levels, and resolution of symptoms with ingestion of calories, not in a supervised fast setting.

d A gastrinoma diagnosis was made when 1 of the following criteria were met: (1) gastrin >10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or (2) gastrin >2ULN twice consecutive in the absence of proton pump inhibitor use (no value <2ULN allowed in between) and not followed by 2 consecutive measurements <2ULN without surgery or start of systemic antitumor therapy or (3) gastrin is >5ULN twice consecutive in the presence of proton pump inhibitor use (no value <5ULN allowed in between) and not followed by 2 consecutive measurements <5ULN without surgery or start of systemic antitumor therapy or (4) positive secretin test or (5) there is dpNET or lymph nodes/liver metastases with positive immunohistochemistry for gastrin.

e Gastrin levels closest to sample collection within ± 12 months window (ULN 100 pg/mL). Gastrin levels were not available for 1 out of the 14 cases and 1 out of the 42 control patients.

f Other functioning tumors were defined as a clinical syndrome in conjunction with elevated hormone levels at least 2 times ULN.

g Three cases were previously treated; 1 was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and somatostatin analogues 1.2 years prior to blood draw, 1 with Yttrium embolization of liver metastases 7 years prior to blood draw, and 1 with chemotherapy 12 years before sample collection and somatostatin analogue up until 9 years before sample collection. None of these 3 cases were on active treatment at the time of blood draw.

h One case was on active treatment with somatostatin analogues.