Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 11;52(7):455–462. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0389-4

Table 1.

. Patient characteristics

UPN1 Sex (M/F)2 Age3 FAB4 Material5 Blasts (%)6 Cytogenetics
1 M 49 M0 BM 85 92 XXYY, der (15;15)(q10;q10)
2 M 55 M1 BM 86 del (9) (q11;q22)
3 M 76 M1 BM 82 Normal
4 M 72 M1 BM 72 Normal
5 F 61 M1 PBMC 83 del (11) (q13;q25)
6 M 69 M2 BM 45 Normal
7 M 24 M3 BM 86 t(15;17)
8 F 46 M4eo BM 68 inv (16)
9 F 35 M4eo PBMC 51 inv (16) del (7) (q22)
10 F 33 M4eo PBMC 34 Monosomy (7)
11 F 22 M4eo BM 70 inv (16)
12 F 34 M4eo BM 31 inv (16)
13 F 69 M5a BM 84 no metaphases
14 M 37 M5a BM 95 Normal
15 F 46 M5a BM 97 t(9;11) (p22;q23)
16 M 38 M5a BM 84 Normal
17 F 54 M5a BM 97 Normal
18 F 63 RAEB-t BM 23 Normal
19 M 77 Unclassified BM 95 Not tested

1Unique patient number.

2 M male, F female.

3Age at diagnosis (years).

4French-American-British classification.

5 BM bone marrow, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

6Percentages of blasts were scored in May-Grünwald-Giemsa stained bone marrow smears or PBMC before gradient cell separation.