Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 12;24:281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.017

Table 2.

AOO identification accuracies. Column one outlines the data distributions and column two outlines the grouping of the identification method as distance-based (DBI) or machine-based (MBI). Column three indicates if the 74 features were included in the order of the greatest to least important SVM weights or RF importance. Column four designates the most efficient identification method according to the least amount of features in column five, and its respective accuracy in column six. The asterisks in Trial 1 indicate the inability for RF and SVM to reach greater than 80% accuracy with less than all 74 features.

Distribution Method Group AOO Order Method # Features Accuracy (%)
70/30 DBI SVM Weights ED Rank 10 3 81.05
DBI
RF Importance
ED Rank 10
3
85.39
MBI SVM Weights RF 10 80.82
MBI RF Importance SVM 6 85.39

Day 1 DBI SVM Weights CS Rank 10 37 81.21
DBI
RF Importance
ED Rank 10
24
84.64
MBI SVM Weights SVM 29 80.93
MBI RF Importance SVM 22 81.07

Trial 1 DBI SVM Weights ED Rank 10 27 81.05
DBI
RF Importance
ED Rank 10
32
81.69
MBI* N/A* RF* * 74 * 70.66
MBI* N/A* SVM* * 74 * 65.94