Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 8;16:1330063. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1330063

Table 3.

Comparison of non-traditional measures of standing balance between the TC group and control group.

TC group Control group p ES
Ultralow_ml (%) 11.02 (5.26) 11.99 (6.08) 0.534 −0.086
Ultralow_ap (%) 9.73 (4.85) 10.73 (5.23) 0.626 −0.068
Very-low_ml (%) 17.98 (5.21) 24.06 (9.76) 0.006 −0.372#
Very-low_ap (%) 24.48 (8.70) 29.41 (9.21) 0.022 −0.551
Low_ml (%) 43.96 (6.93) 41.69 (10.04) 0.268 0.263
Low_ap (%) 39.56 (6.64) 38.81 (7.86) 0.663 0.103
Moderate_ml (%) 27.04 (6.28) 22.27 (5.98) < 0.001 0.454#
Moderate_ap (%) 26.23 (8.03) 21.05 (7.57) 0.004 0.387#
CI_ml 12.26 (2.32) 10.47 (3.56) 0.014 0.593
CI_ap 10.60 (2.47) 8.29 (2.29) < 0.001 0.971
DET_ml 72.87 (10.35) 77.85 (13.69) 0.017 −0.326#
DET_ap 79.55 (11.27) 88.05 (8.05) < 0.001 −0.497#

Values are expressed as mean (standard deviations); TC (Tai Chi); ES (effect size). Bold p-values represent p < 0.05. denotes an effect size greater than the medium threshold (0.5) for independent t-tests. # denotes an effect size greater than the moderate threshold (0.3) for Mann–Whitney U tests.