. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 22.

Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr 28;37(3):650–675. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2067078

Table 5.

Predictive value of structural language and pragmatic language on behavioral problems one year later in children with sex chromosome trisomy and controls.

		Total model			Structural			Pragmatic
		R	R²	p	β	Part corr.	VAF	β	Part corr.	VAF
SCT	Anxiety	.23	.05	.308	−.08	−.08		−.21	−.20
	Affective	.45	.20	.009	−.21	−.21		−.36^*	−.35	12.5%
	Oppositional defiant	.41	.17	.021	.02	.01		−.41^**	−.41	16.5%
	Attention deficit	.63	.39	<.001	−.29^*	−.29	8.1%	−.51^***	−.50	24.7%
	Pervasive developmental	.81	.66	<.001	−.53^***	−.52	26.7%	−.53^***	−.53	27.6%
	Social-emotional	.73	.53	<.001	−.26^*	−.25	6.5%	−.64^***	−.63	39.1%
Controls	Anxiety	.26	.07	.379	−.17	−.16		−.14	−.13
	Affective	.19	.04	.157	−.08	−.07		−.15	−.14
	Oppositional defiant^a	.30	.09	.021	−.30^*	−.30	9.1%	–	–
	Attention deficit^a	.39	.16	.002	−.39^**	−.39	15.5%	−	–
	Pervasive developmental	.23	.05	.404	−.12	−.11		−.17	−.16
	Social-emotional	.34	.12	.031	−.01	−.01		−.34^*	−.32	10.4%

p < .05

^**

p <.01

^***

p < .001.

Abbreviations: SCT = sex chromosome trisomy; Part corr. = part correlation; VAF = unique variance accounted for by this variable.

As adding pragmatic language did not improve the model in the control group, the model that includes only structural language was reported and interpreted.

Note: NSCT group = 48 for anxiety, affective, oppositional defiant, attention deficit, and social-emotional; N= 29 for pervasive developmental. N control group = 58 for anxiety, affective, oppositional defiant, attention deficit, and social-emotional; N= 36 for pervasive developmental.