Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 12;2014(6):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub3

Weingarten 2010.

Methods Parallel randomized controlled trial
 High risk of bias
Participants
  1. 40 participants randomly assigned

  2. Included: participants 65 years of age undergoing major open abdominal surgery

  3. Excluded: pulmonary disease with abnormalities in spirometry consistent with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease, active asthma (requiring chronic bronchodilator therapy), previous lung surgery, home oxygen therapy, significant cardiac dysfunction and BMI > 35

  4. Age: years (mean 72.1, range (65‐88); 73.8, range (65‐88))

  5. Sex distribution: M/F (16/4, 15/5)

  6. Country: United States

Interventions
  1. 20 participants received PEEP (4 cm H2O) until the first recruitment manoeuvre. The recruitment manoeuvre was achieved by sequential increases in PEEP in 3 steps: 3 breaths (from 4 to 10 cm H2O), 3 breaths (15 cm H2O) and 10 breaths (20 cm H2O). After recruitment manoeuvre, level of PEEP was maintained at 12 cm H2O throughout the entire operation

  2. 20 participants received ZEEP without recruitment maneuvers

Outcomes
  1. Arterial blood gas parameters

  2. Oxygen efficiency: intraoperative and recovery room data

  3. Interleukins 6 and 8

  4. Postoperative pulmonary complications

  5. Postoperative respiratory failure

  6. Length of hospital stay

  7. Mortality during admission

Notes SIngle centre
 Atelectasis was analysed by chest x‐ray
 Study authors defined postoperative respiratory failure as unanticipated mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours after operation or the need for reinstitution of mechanical or non‐invasive ventilation after extubation
 Could be included in the following subgroup analyses: increased age (> 60 years)
 We emailed the study authors to remove our doubts. Study authors provided data about length of hospital stay
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Quote: "Patients were randomized to one of the two ventilatory management strategies using a randomization schedule provided by the Division of Biostatistics"
 Comment: not clear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Mortality Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Oxigen efficiency ‐ PaO2/FiO2 Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Atelectasis Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Mortality Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Oxigen efficiency ‐ PaO2/FiO2 Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Atelectasis Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes reported