Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 8;15:1349375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349375

Table 3.

The results of the multi-group alignment analysis.

Subscale/item Loadings Percentage of non-invariance item parameters Intercepts Percentage of non-invariance item parameters
Identity Exploration Armenia China Russia Armenia China Russia
EA 24 0.53 0.53 0.53 0 3.364 3.162* 3.364 11.1%
EA25 0.577 0.577 0.577 3.391 3.391 3.391
EA26 0.531 0.531 0.531 3.295 3.295 3.295
Instability/ Negativity Armenia China Russia Armenia China Russia
EA3 0.552 0.552 0.552 0 2.853 2.853 2.582* 27.8%
EA6 0.487 0.487 0.487 2.209 2.209 1.806*
EA8 0.795 0.795 0.795 2.751 2.453* 2.751
EA9 0.77 0.77 0.77 2.598 2.598 2.598
EA11 0.761 0.761 0.761 2.168 2.168 2.168
EA20 0.556 0.556 0.556 2.823* 2.115* 3.090*
Feeling in-between Armenia China Russia Armenia China Russia
EA27 0.438 0.438 0.438 0 3.315 3.315 3.315 0
EA28 0.518 0.518 0.518 3.495 3.495 3.495
EA29 0.512 0.512 0.512 3.453 3.453 3.453
EA30 0.482 0.482 0.482 3.472 3.472 3.472
Experimentation/Possibilities Armenia China Russia Armenia China Russia
EA1 0.461 0.461 0.461 0 3.332 3.332 3.332 0
EA2 0.52 0.52 0.52 3.478 3.478 3.478
EA4 0.446 0.446 0.446 3.297 3.297 3.297
EA21 0.478 0.478 0.478 3.406 3.406 3.406
Self-focused Armenia China Russia Armenia China Russia
EA5 0.51 0.51 0.51 0 3.134 3.134 3.134 8.3%
EA15 0.612 0.612 0.612 3.230 3.522* 3.230
EA16 0.601 0.601 0.601 3.396 3.396 3.396
EA19 0.446 0.446 0.446 3.042 3.042 3.042

*Differences in mean values between countries are shown in bold.