Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 23;25:161. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05768-9

Table 1.

Scores of algorithms when aligning short reads to REF-1

Algorithm Strain Species Genus
F1 Sensitivity Precision F1 Sensitivity Precision F1 Sensitivity Precision
Pufferfish 62.12 47.27 90.58 66.04 50.25 96.29 67.92 51.68 99.05
Mora + Pufferfish 66.20 50.37 96.53 67.04 51.01 97.75 68.49 52.11 99.87
AugPatho2 + Pufferfish 66.62 50.69 97.14 66.90 50.90 97.55 68.49 52.11 99.87
Bowtie2 84.54 78.04 92.20 88.94 82.11 97.01 91.21 84.21 99.48
Mora + Bowtie2 87.59 80.86 95.54 89.22 82.37 97.32 91.48 84.46 99.79
AugPatho2 + Bowtie2 89.03 82.19 97.10 89.64 82.76 97.77 91.50 84.47 99.80
Kraken2 NA NA NA 88.19 83.57 93.36 92.36 87.52 97.77
Clark 59.38 55.21 64.23 91.12 84.71 98.57 92.04 85.58 99.57

Both Mora and AugPatho2 were able to improve the scores of the initial aligner, though AugPatho2 appears to have a slight systematic edge