Table 5.
Final Treatment Outcomes
| Study | Participant ID | Procedure Selected for Treatment | Avoidance Index and Rank of Selected Procedure | Final Treatment Efficacy Reported by Authors (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fisher et al. (1994a) | Hatti | Contingent Demands | 8.5 (1/8) | 90.6 |
| Milt | Facial Screen | 5.7 (1/4) | 91.2 | |
| Fisher et al. (1994b) | Ava | Facial Screen | 3.4 (1/9) | NS |
| Jeff | Facial Screen | 24.0 (1/7) | NS | |
| Tom | Facial Screen | 113.0 (1/6) | NS | |
| Toole et al. (2004) | Mitchell | NS | NS | NS |
| Nancy | NS | NS | NS | |
| DeRosa et al. (2016) | Darnell | Facial Screen | NS | 96.5 |
| Manente & LaRue (2017) | Tony | Reprimand | NS | 85.7 |
| Mitteer et al. (2015) | Callie | Facial Screen | NS | NS |
| Kurtz et al. (2003) | Case 1 | NS | NS |
100 (SIB) 99.7 (Combined) |
| Case 2 | NS | NS |
94.0 (SIB) 29.6 (Combined) |
|
| Case 4 | NS | NS |
100 (SIB) 95.9 (Combined) |
|
| Case 5 | NS | NS |
77.0 (SIB) 76.8 (Combined) |
|
| Case 7 | NS | NS |
100 (SIB) 89.4 (Combined) |
|
| Case 11 | NS | NS |
100 (SIB) 94.0 (Combined) |
|
| Case 19 | NS | NS |
89.0 (SIB) 62.8 (Combined) |
|
| Case 21 | NS | NS |
74.5 (SIB) 82.2 (Combined) |
|
| Case 26 | NS | NS |
100 (SIB) 99.7 (Combined) |
|
| Case 29 | NS | NS | 89.7 (SIB) | |
| Kurtz et al. (2015) | Andrew | Baskethold | NS | 93.3; 98.3 |
| Ben | Facial Screen | NS | 94.9 | |
| Simmons et al. (2021) | Norbert | Baskethold | 2.0 (3/4) | 86.4 |
| Jordan | Baskethold | 3.7 (2/4) | 90.2 | |
| Brown et al. (2021) | Case 1 | NS | NS | NS |
| Case 2 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 3 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 4 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 5 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 6 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 7 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Case 8 | NS | NS | NS |
NS = not specified; Combined = combined destructive behavior