TABLE 4.
Effect of the ecological factors on the diet composition of the langurs in Encheng National Nature Reserve based on the results of the model averaging.
| Variables | Mature leaves | Young leaves | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | Wip | β | 2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | Wip | |
| (Intercept) | −33.216 | −123.244 | 56.813 | 9.304 | −6.990 | 25.598 | ||
| FAI (Mature leaves) | 21.060 | −21.858 | 63.979 | 0.76 | −6.022 | −15.034 | 2.990 | 1.00 |
| FAI (Young leaves) | −12.438* | −24.724 | −0.152 | 1.00 | −0.026 | −0.976 | 0.925 | 0.16 |
| FAI (Flowers) | 13.501* | 1.456 | 25.536 | 1.00 | −0.069 | −0.796 | 0.658 | 0.17 |
| FAI (Friuts) | 2.010 | −7.594 | 11.614 | 0.37 | 0.639 | −0.733 | 2.010 | 0.75 |
| Rainfall | −0.341 | −4.702 | 4.019 | 0.13 | −0.333 | −0.753 | 0.086 | 1.000 |
| Taverage | −4.957 | −34.836 | 24.923 | 0.15 | 4.690* | 0.753 | 8.627 | 1.000 |
| Variables | Flowers | Fruits | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | Wip | β | 2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | Wip | |
| (Intercept) | 32.473 | −6.168 | 71.113 | 4.068 | −15.365 | 23.502 | ||
| FAI (Mature leaves) | −15.370 | −33.849 | 3.208 | 1.00 | −5.628 | −24.707 | 13.452 | 0.17 |
| FAI (Young leaves) | −2.463 | −5.679 | 0.753 | 1.00 | −0.066 | −0.988 | 0.856 | 0.08 |
| FAI (Flowers) | 3.400* | 0.545 | 6.254 | 1.00 | −0.243 | −1.303 | 0.816 | 0.10 |
| FAI (Friuts) | 2.574 | −0.347 | 5.495 | 1.00 | 0.852 | −1.706 | 3.410 | 0.26 |
| Rainfall | 0.187 | −0.715 | 1.089 | 0.29 | 0.383 | −0.583 | 1.350 | 0.24 |
| Taverage | 0.170 | −7.447 | 7.786 | 0.19 | −3.589 | −12.224 | 5.046 | 0.25 |
Note: β, model‐averaged regression coefficients; 2.5%CI/97.5%CI, the 95% confidence intervals of regression coefficients β; Wip, relative variable importance. Regression coefficients β with the 95% confidence intervals excluding zero are denoted by asterisks. Model‐averaged 95% confidence intervals excluded zero listed in bold.