Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 9;11:1389655. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1389655

Table 3.

Statistically optimal segment-specific cut-offs.

Number of patients/segments Cut-off (mm) AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity Positive LR Negative LR Correctly classified
CSTA 101/159 0.86 0.92 (0.86–0.97) 86.2% (75.1–92.8%) 93.1% (86.4–96.6%) 12.44 (6.04–25.61) 0.15 (0.08–0.28) 90.6% (85.0–94.2%)
TA frontal branch 129/241 0.68 0.96 (0.94–0.98) 93.3% (86.8–96.7%) 88.3% (81.9–92.7%) 7.99 (5.02–12.69) 0.08 (0.04–0.16) 90.5% (86.1–93.6%)
TA parietal branch 117/209 0.67 0.90 (0.85–0.95) 76.2% (65.9–84.2%) 95.3% (90.2–97.9%) 16.39 (7.43–36.15) 0.25 (0.17–0.37) 88.0% (82.9–91.8%)
Overall a 133 b /609 0.68 0.92 (0.89–0.94) 86.4% (81.5–90.1%) 85.3% (81.3–88.5%) 5.87 (4.57–7.55) 0.16 (0.12–0.22) 85.7% (82.7–88.3%)

Cut-offs for the compressed lumen technique (combining both walls), calculated using method by Youden.

a

all segments combined.

b

11 Patients with giant cell arteritis had a normal T1-BB-MRI for all segments and were not included in this analysis. AUC; area under the curve; CSTA, common superficial temporal artery; LR, likelihood ratio; TA, temporal artery.