Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 16;9(3):713–727. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.04.008

Table 1.

Model parameters and symbology used in model. Estimate indicates value used in initial model trial; values in parentheses represent range of value used in sensitivity analysis.

Symbol Description Estimate Range used in sensitivity analysis Reference Notes
βLarva Probability larva will acquire pathogen from infected dog 0.11 0.05–0.30 Piranda et al. (2011)
βNymph Probability nymph will acquire pathogen from infected dog 0.35 0.1–0.7 Piranda et al. (2011)
βAdult Probability adult will acquire pathogen from infected dog 0 0–0.25 Piranda et al. (2011) Female ticks that are not infected until they are adults do not pass the infection on to offspring.
βDog Probability that a dog will become infected if fed on by infected tick 0.5 0.1–0.9 Binder et al. (2021)
ToT Filial Transmission 0.37 0.05–0.75 Piranda et al. (2011)
γ Recovery Rate 1/7 1/15-1/3 (Levin et al., 2014; Piranda et al., 2008, 2011) Average duration of rickettsemia is 7 days
ω Loss of immunity No loss of immunity 1/180-1/4000 Levin et al. (2014)
μ Daily per capita dog birth/death rate 0.001 0.0001–0.005 (Garcia et al., 2018; López-Pérez et al., 2020; Villatoro et al., 2016), others
MLarva Tick acquisition rate 25 7.25–100 (J. Foley et al., 2019; Tinoco-Gracia et al., 2009) Maximum number of new ticks of each life stage feeding on a dog per day at highest point in season
MNymph 5 1.25–20
MAdult 1 0.25–4
Time lag (Interstadial time) Time (days) for ticks to move from one stage to the next 60 30–120 Louly et al. (2007) Time it takes for tick to transition from one instar to next