Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):1159–1170. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00912-3

Table 3.

Correlation between WEM and ppVD in different groups of patients with TAO

ppVD (%) Before adjusting After adjusting*
r p r p
Whole 52.0582 ± 2.51869 0.253 0.042 0.306 0.017
S-Hemi 52.2072 ± 2.70443 0.21 0.093 0.273 0.033
I-Hemi 51.8911 ± 2.77253 0.269 0.030 0.286 0.025
NS 46.2786 ± 4.29851 0.076 0.549 0.052 0.690
NI 46.1905 ± 4.45785 0.279 0.024 -0.054 0.677
IN 51.5102 ± 4.43887 0.235 0.060 0.279 0.030
IT 56.4786 ± 4.30438 0.216 0.085 0.29 0.024
TI 6.5982 ± 378.76292 0.195 0.119 0.105 0.421
TS 10.9829 ± 379.31457 0.115 0.361 0.104 0.424
ST 53.6462 ± 3.80568 0.287 0.021 0.274 0.033
SN 50.4791 ± 4.12793 0.253 0.042 0.298 0.020

The p-value indicated in bold meets the threshold of 0.05

*Age, gender, AL and bIOP were used as control variables to adjust the correlation analysis

WEM whole eye movement, ppVD peripapillary vessel density, TAO thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, NS nasal-superior, NI nasal-inferior, IN inferior-nasal, IT inferior-temporal, TI temporal-inferior, TS temporal-superior, ST superior-temporal, SN superior-nasal, AL axial length, bIOP biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure