Table 3.
CFAa results.
| Value | Relative χ2 (df) | CFIb | TLIc |
| Achievementd | —e | — | — |
| Benevolencef | — | — | — |
| Conformity | 1.9 (8) | 0.968 | 0.940 |
| Hedonismd | — | — | — |
| Power | 3.4 (8) | 0.917 | 0.845 |
| Security | 2.1 (7) | 0.977 | 0.950 |
| Tradition | 1.8 (8) | 0.970 | 0.943 |
| Universalism | 3.7 (7) | 0.869 | 0.803 |
| Self-direction | 1.9 (7) | 0.972 | 0.941 |
| Stimulationd | — | — | — |
aCFA: confirmatory factor analysis.
bCFI: comparative fit index.
cTLI: Tucker-Lewis index.
dThe model had 0 degrees of freedom, so goodness-of-fit indices could not be computed.
eNot applicable.
fThe model did not converge.