Skip to main content
. 2005 May;138(1):304–318. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.053793

Table I.

Comparative analysis of changes in transcript and metabolic levels in response to sulfur deficiency

R, Ratio of average level at depleted sulfur (−S)/average level at normal S; P, probability value of the t test.

Experiment ID
Sulfur-Responding Analytes, R > 2.5 or <0.4 with P < 0.05, in % to Total No. of Analyzed Analytes
Expressed Sequence Tag Clonesa (R > 2.5/R < 0.4) Metabolites (R > 2.5/R < 0.4)
Experiment 2.1, 6 d at −S 2.0 (1.0/0.9) 7.1 (5.9/1.2)
Experiment 2.2, 10 d at −S 2.5 (1.9/0.6) 9.3 (7.0/2.3)
Experiment 1.1, 10 d at −S 3.4 (2.3/1.1) 11.4 (8.6/2.8)
Experiment 1.2, 13 d at −S 4.9 (1.3/3.6) 11.5 (8.6/2.9)
a

Numbers are calculated from the transcript data reported earlier (Nikiforova et al., 2003).