Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Apr 12:rs.3.rs-4233045. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4233045/v1

Table 2.

Least square mean and SE for fibrosis, epithelium inflammation, stromal inflammation, and eosinophil score derived from a histological evaluation of uterine cross sections. Data are presented for healthy versus metritis that were either treated with antibiotic (Ab) or not treated (No trt) with antibiotic (top panel) and clear versus purulent uterine flush that were either Ab treated or not treated (bottom panel) at disease diagnosis.

Healthy (n = 17) Metritis (n = 18)
Item1 Ab
(n = 9)
No trt
(n = 8)
SE Ab
(n = 9)
No trt
(n = 9)
SE
Fibrosis score 2.44 2.67 0.12 2.52 2.59 0.10
Epithelial inflammation scorey 0.87 1.15 0.10 1.21 1.00 0.08
Stromal inflammation scorez 2.58 2.79 0.04 2.73 2.66 0.034
Eosinophil scorex 0.94 1.33 0.17 1.76 1.40 0.14
Clear (n = 17) Purulent (n = 18)
Item Ab
(n = 10)
No trt
(n = 10)
SE Ab
(n = 8)
No trt
(n = 7)
SE
Fibrosis score** 2.30 2.48 0.10 2.66 2.78 0.12
Epithelial inflammation score*** 0.88 0.80 0.08 1.21 1.35 0.10
Stromal inflammation score**,y 2.65 2.62 0.03 2.66 2.84 0.04
Eosinophil score*** 1.01 0.83 0.14 1.68 1.90 0.17
1

Histological scoring of endometrial fibrosis (1 to 3; mild to severe) and endometrial inflammatory cell or eosinophil scored from 0.5 (< 10 cells/field) to 3 (> 50 cells/field)]. Asterix (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001) is for the probability of the main effect (healthy versus metritis or clear versus purulent). Letter is for the interaction of the main effect with treatment (xP < 0.05, yP<0.01, zP<0.001).