Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 24;7(4):e248491. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8491

Table 3. Association Between Different Strata of Self-Rated Health Measures and Subsequent Fracture and Mortality After Fracture.

Health measure HR (95% CI)a
Females Males
Subsequent fracture risk Mortality risk Subsequent fracture risk Mortality risk
Overall health
Excellent 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Very good 1.00 (0.86-1.17) 1.46 (1.14-1.87)b 1.08 (0.86-1.37) 1.29 (1.03-1.62)b
Good 1.20 (1.03-1.40)b 1.98 (1.56-2.50)b 1.17 (0.89-1.40) 1.63 (1.31-2.02)b
Fair 1.37 (1.16-1.62)b 2.86 (2.24-3.65)b 1.36 (1.06-1.74)b 2.32 (1.86-2.90)b
Poor 1.54 (1.20-1.98)b 3.99 (3.01-5.30)b 1.49 (1.03-2.14)b 3.21 (2.43-4.24)b
Quality of life
Excellent 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Very good 0.99 (0.87-1.13) 1.41 (1.16-1.71)b 1.12 (0.92-1.36) 1.47 (1.22-1.76)b
Good 1.18 (1.04-1.35)b 1.82 (1.51-2.19)b 1.14 (0.94-1.39) 1.81 (1.51-2.16)b
Fair 1.48 (1.27-1.72)b 2.30 (1.88-2.81)b 1.30 (1.03-1.63)b 2.05 (1.69-2.48)b
Poor 1.58 (1.22-2.03)b 3.07 (2.37-3.97)b 1.37 (1.01-2.11)b 2.51 (1.91-3.29)b
Overall memory
Excellent 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Very good 0.95 (0.82-1.11) 0.98 (0.82-1.16) 1.04 (0.82-1.30) 0.92 (0.77-1.10)
Good 1.13 (0.98-1.30) 1.04 (0.89-1.22) 1.01 (0.81-1.26) 1.03 (0.87-1.21)
Fair 1.24 (1.06-1.44)b 1.21 (1.02-1.43)b 1.25 (0.99-1.57) 1.17 (0.99-1.38)
Poor 1.40 (1.11-1.77)b 1.49 (1.19-1.86)b 1.34 (0.98-1.83) 1.43 (1.15-1.78)b
Quality of eyesight
Excellent 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Very good 0.96 (0.82-1.12) 1.06 (0.87-1.28) 0.91 (0.72-1.15) 1.09 (0.90-1.33)
Good 0.99 (0.85-1.16) 1.26 (1.05-1.52)b 1.00 (0.80-1.24) 1.30 (1.08-1.55)b
Fair 1.07 (0.90-1.26) 1.35 (1.11-1.64)b 1.04 (0.81-1.32) 1.35 (1.11-1.64)b
Poor 1.13 (0.91-1.41) 1.33 (1.06-1.68)b 0.91 (0.63-1.32) 1.65 (1.29-2.11)b

Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.

a

Models were adjusted for age, weight, falls, prior fractures, aged care residency, help for disability, and smoking status. In all models, each stratum’s HR was compared with the reference stratum (those who reported “excellent”) for that measure.

b

Significant at 2-sided P < .05.