Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 18;44(17):e1231232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1231-23.2024

Table 2.

Associations between socioeconomic conditions and the measures of WM microstructure

MD MT R2* ICVF ISOVF OD
Last known occupation 0.041, (−0.035, 0.116) −0.020, (−0.095, 0.054) −0.027, (−0.112, 0.057) −0.031, (−0.120, 0.057) 0.017, (−0.058, 0.093) −0.032, (−0.119, 0.055)
p value 0.293 0.590 0.530 0.487 0.651 0.467
N = 661
Household income 0.111 (0.036, 0.187) −0.088 (−0.163, −0.012) −0.099, (−0.184, −0.014) −0.118, (−0.207, −0.029) 0.040, (−0.038, 0.118) −0.000, (−0.089, 0.088)
p value 0.004 0.023 0.023 0.009 0.314 0.992
N = 556
Social mobility 0.071, (−0.002, 0.145) −0.032, (−0.105, 0.041) −0.024, (−0.107, 0.058) −0.048, (−0.134, 0.039) 0.050, (−0.024, 0.124) −0.012, (−0.098, 0.073)
p value 0.058 0.389 0.564 0.279 0.183 0.782
N = 641

The results are standardized regression coefficients and 95% CI in parentheses for the lowest versus highest socioeconomic group; models adjusted for age, age square, sex, and total intracranial volume; MD, mean diffusivity; MT, magnetization transfer; R2*, transverse relaxation rate; ICVF, intracellular volume fraction; ISOVF, isotropic volume fraction; OD, orientation dispersion index.