Table 2.
The results of conditional process analysis.
| Predictor variables | R | R2 | F | B | t | LLCI | ULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative coping styles | Age | 0.24 | 0.06 | 2.91** | 0.02 | 0.19 | −0.17 | 0.21 |
| Gender | −0.10 | −0.88 | −0.34 | 0.21 | ||||
| Family economic situation | −0.05 | −0.43 | −0.25 | 0.16 | ||||
| Uncertainty intolerance | 0.18 | 2.99** | 0.06 | 0.29 | ||||
| Perceived environment uncertainty | −0.11 | −1.77 | −0.22 | 0.01 | ||||
| Interaction term | 0.09 | 2.03* | 0.003 | 0.18 | ||||
| Ego depletion | Age | 0.35 | 0.12 | 5.61** | 0.06 | 0.59 | −0.13 | 0.24 |
| Gender | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.23 | 0.22 | ||||
| Family economic situation | −0.18 | −1.78 | −0.38 | 0.02 | ||||
| Uncertainty intolerance | 0.24 | 4.15*** | 0.13 | 0.36 | ||||
| Negative coping styles | 0.17 | 3.03** | 0.06 | 0.29 | ||||
| Perceived environment uncertainty | −0.07 | −1.23 | −0.19 | 0.04 | ||||
| Interaction term | −0.003 | −0.06 | −0.09 | 0.09 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.