Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2024 Apr 9;9(16):18212–18223. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c10399

Metabolic Profiling in Plasma and Brain Induced by 17β-Estradiol Supplementation in Ovariectomized Mice

So Hwi Yang , Ye Jin Kim , Hye Rim Yang , Sang Un Park , Jae Geun Kim †,*, Jae Kwang Kim †,§,*
PMCID: PMC11044158  PMID: 38680363

Abstract

graphic file with name ao3c10399_0007.jpg

17β-Estradiol is an ovarian hormone that regulates energy circulation and storage by acting on the central nervous system. However, the metabolic differences between the blood and brain when stimulated by 17β-estradiol are poorly understood. Moreover, research using menopause-induced models to investigate primary metabolites in the blood and brain is limited. Thus, this study aimed to identify metabolic changes in the plasma and brain resulting from 17β-estradiol supplementation in an estrogen-deficient mouse model. Three groups of mice were utilized: sham-operated mice (Sham), ovariectomized mice (OVX), and ovariectomized mice that received a weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol (E2). Plasma and brain samples from these mice were subjected to metabolic analysis using gas chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry. Compared with the plasma samples from the Sham and OVX groups, the plasma samples from the E2 group contained higher contents of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), such as valine, isoleucine, and leucine. Meanwhile, the brain samples from the E2 group contained higher contents of most metabolites, including BCAAs, neurotransmitters, tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, and fatty acids, than those from the two other groups. This study is the first to reveal differences in energy metabolism induced by 17β-estradiol supplementation through brain metabolic profiling of ovariectomized mice, emphasizing the importance of brain metabolic profiling in menopausal hormone research.

1. Introduction

Estrogen is a vital mediator of various physiological processes in the nervous, immune, and cardiovascular systems of the body.1 Estrogen deficiency is common in women during menopause and is associated with conditions such as osteoporosis, metabolic dysfunction, and neurological diseases.2,3 17β-Estradiol, one of the primary estrogens produced in the ovaries, regulates energy homeostasis and is closely linked to health issues in postmenopausal women.4,5 Historically, 17β-estradiol has been widely used in menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) to prevent and manage these conditions. However, in recent years, the need for comprehensive studies on MHT has become clear owing to a better understanding of the timing, method, and age-dependent side effects of its administration.6,7 Human menopause typically spans 4–5 years and is challenging to study because of the diversity of environmental and genetic factors. Therefore, rodents, which share certain characteristics with humans and have shorter lifespans, are suitable models for studying menopause. Specifically, the ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model is valuable for researching and comprehending the hormonal changes resulting from menopause because it surgically induces estrogen deficiency.8

Metabolomics can explain biological changes through analysis of the concentration and pathways of metabolites that act as reactants and products in metabolic reactions.9 Hormones transported to the brain via the bloodstream play essential roles in various bodily functions, including the regulation of energy metabolism and immune responses.10 The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is the most tightly regulated interface among the brain and circulatory system. The BBB, which is composed of the lipophilic membrane, selectively allows hydrophilic substances transported in the blood to maintain homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS) environment.11,12 In particular, 17β-estradiol is transported through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to the hypothalamus of the brain, where it interacts with various neurons to regulate metabolism.13 Therefore, it is noteworthy that 17β-estradiol passes through the BBB and affects the central nervous system. This is why it is important to understand the metabolic differences between blood and the brain affected by 17β-estradiol. However, little is known about the effects of 17β-estradiol supplementation on brain metabolism.

Hence, our study aimed to identify metabolic changes in the plasma and brain resulting from 17β-estradiol supplementation in an estrogen-deficient mouse model. This study is the first to identify these metabolic changes in the OVX mouse brain, highlighting the importance of metabolomics in MHT. Additionally, it serves as a foundation for further research on the OVX mouse model using metabolite analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Sample Collection

Eighteen eight-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (DBL, Eumseong, Korea) weighing 19–21 g were accommodated in a controlled chamber with constant temperature and humidity (25 °C and 55 ± 5%) under a 12-h light/dark cycle (light exposure from 7:00 to 19:00). The mice had ad libitum access to tap water and standard chow pellets (DBL). All animal care and experimental procedures were performed in compliance with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Incheon National University (permission number: INU-ANIM-2020–04). After a week acclimatization period, the mice were randomly assigned to different groups: sham-operated mice (sham, n = 6), ovariectomized mice (OVX, n = 6), and ovariectomized mice that received a supplementation of 17β-estradiol (E2, n = 6). The mice were anesthetized through intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 0.3% tribromoethanol (0.3 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The ovaries of the mice in the OVX and E2 groups were removed by cutting the anterior uterine horns. In the sham group, dorsoventral incisions were made through the skin, muscles, and periosteum, similar to those in the OVX animals but without removing the ovaries. However, several ovariectomized mice died during the surgery. Therefore, excluding the sham group (sham, n = 6), the remaining 10 mice were divided into two groups according to hormone supplementation (OVX, n = 5; E2, n = 5). After a 3 week recovery period, the mice were received i.p. injections of either vehicle (0.9% saline) or 17β-estradiol (0.2 mg/kg twice weekly, Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 weeks. The dose and duration of 17β-estradiol supplementation were determined based on previous studies related to estrogen treatment.14,15 Body weight changes were monitored every week for 9 weeks to assess the recovery after ovariectomized surgery and evaluate the effectiveness of 17β-estradiol supplementation. At the end of the body weight monitoring period, blood samples were collected from the anesthetized mice using a 24G syringe. The blood samples were immediately placed into 2 mL tubes containing 20 μL of heparin (100 μg/μL, Sigma-Aldrich). Plasma samples were obtained by centrifuging total blood at 3,500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Following blood collection, the brain, liver, subcutaneous white adipose tissue (SC-WAT), parametrial white adipose tissue (PM-WAT), and uterus were quickly extracted from the mice and then weighed to compare general characteristics among the groups. All extracted tissues were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analyses, and all samples were stored at −80 °C until further processing.

2.2. Sample Extraction and Analysis of Metabolites

Low-molecular metabolites, such as amino acids, organic acids, sugars, sterols, and fatty acids, were obtained from the plasma and brain in this study and then analyzed.16 To extract low-molecular metabolites, 500 μL of methanol–chloroform (3:1, v/v) solution was added to blood (50 μL) and half brain (approximately 200 mg) samples in 2 mL tubes. The half brain samples were added with approximately 200 mg of beads (425–600 μm) and then agitated (Mini Bead beater 96, BioSpec products, USA) twice for 20 s. Then, the tubes containing the brain samples were added with 500 μL of methanol–chloroform, producing 1 mL of extraction solvent. Afterward, 30 μL of l-2-chlorophenylalanine (0.3 mg/mL), which serves as an internal standard (IS), was added to the plasma and brain samples, respectively. The tubes were vortex mixed for 10 s, stored in a deep freezer at −20 °C for 10 min, sonicated for 10 min at 20 °C, and then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and then concentrated for 2 h in a vacuum concentrator (CVE–3110, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). The concentrated sample underwent derivatization, first for 90 min at 37 °C in 100 μL of methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg/mL), and then treated with 100 μL of N,O–bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane at 60 °C for 60 min. The brain samples were freeze-dried for 16 h before derivatization. The tubes containing the derivatized samples were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The supernatant was passed through a 0.5 μm hydrophobic membrane filter and then transferred to a glass insert in an autosampler vial. Gas chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry (GC–TOF–MS) was used to analyze the low-molecular metabolites. An Agilent 7890A GC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was connected to a Pegasus GC–TOFMS Benchtop (LECO, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Helium gas was passed through the GC at a rate of 1 mL/min using the CP-Sil 8 CB Low Bleed/MS (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25−μm i.d. film thickness; CP 5860, Agilent) column. Split mode was used to inject 1 μL of sample at a ratio of 1:15, with an inlet temperature of 230 °C. The oven’s temperature was set to begin at 80 °C for 2 min, ramped up to 320 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min, and then held for 10 min. The temperatures of the transfer line and ion source were set at 250 °C, respectively. The spectral data were scanned on an 85–600 m/z mass scale. Based on the specified ions, the ratio of the relative peak area to that of the IS was calculated for quantification (Table 1).

Table 1. Relative Retention Times (RRT) and Mass Spectrometry Data of Low-Molecular-Weight Metabolites in the Plasma and Brain.

compound RTa RRTb quantification ionc mass fragmentd
pyruvic acid 04:56.3 0.427 174 89, 115, 174
lactic acid 05:02.1 0.436 117 117, 147, 191
alanine 05:31.9 0.479 116 116, 147, 190
oxalic acid 05:57.8 0.516 147 117, 133, 147
hydroxybutanoic acid 06:09.3 0.533 233 147, 177, 205
valine 06:44.7 0.584 144 144, 156, 218
urea 07:03.4 0.611 147 147, 189
serine1 07:11.2 0.622 116 116, 132, 147
ethanolamine 07:16.0 0.629 174 100, 147, 174
glycerol 07:16.6 0.630 147 147, 177, 205
phosphoric acid 07:17.8 0.632 299 211, 299, 314
leucine 07:18.5 0.633 158 102, 147, 158
isoleucine 07:31.3 0.651 158 147, 158, 218
proline 07:36.7 0.659 142 142, 143, 147
glycine 07:40.0 0.664 174 147, 174, 248
succinic acid 07:44.3 0.670 147 147, 149, 247
fumaric acid 08:04.5 0.699 245 143, 147, 245
serine2 08:07.1 0.703 116 100, 147, 204
threonine 08:21.1 0.723 291 117, 218, 291
β-alanine 08:47.0 0.760 174 147, 174, 248
malic acid 09:14.9 0.800 147 100, 147, 218
aspartic acid 09:32.0 0.825 100 100, 147, 232
methionine 09:35.4 0.830 176 128, 147, 176
pyroglutamic acid 09:38.5 0.835 156 147, 156, 230
GABAe 09:39.9 0.837 304 147, 174, 304
cysteine 09:51.2 0.853 220 100, 147, 220
glutamic acid 10:20.7 0.895 246 128, 156, 246
phenylalanine 10:28.8 0.907 218 100, 192, 218
asparagine 10:44.7 0.930 116 116, 132, 231
xylitol 11:01.4 0.954 217 103, 147, 217
ribitol 11:03.9 0.958 217 103, 147, 217
glutamine 11:31.3 0.997 156 147, 156, 245
l-2-chlorophenylalaninef 11:33.2 1.000 218 147, 218, 226
citric acid 11:47.0 1.020 273 147, 273, 348
fructose1 12:06.5 1.048 103 103, 147, 217
fructose2 12:10.3 1.054 103 103, 147, 217
mannose 12:12.7 1.057 319 147, 205, 319
glucose1 12:17.4 1.064 319 147, 205, 319
glucose2 12:26.3 1.077 319 147, 205, 319
lysine 12:31.8 1.085 317 156, 174, 317
C16:1 13:16.8 1.149 311 117, 132, 311
C16:0 13:24.2 1.160 313 117, 132, 313
inositol 13:36.0 1.177 305 147, 217, 305
C18:2 14:25.7 1.249 337 129, 262, 337
C18:1n9 14:27.5 1.251 339 117, 129, 339
tryptophan 14:27.7 1.252 202 147, 202, 218
C18:0 14:35.8 1.263 341 117, 132, 341
sucrose 16:31.7 1.431 217 147, 217, 361
cholesterol 19:28.0 1.685 329 129, 329, 368
a

Retention time (m:s).

b

Relative retention time (retention time of analyte/retention time of L-2-cholorophenylalanine).

c

Specific mass ion used for quantification.

d

Three highest intensity ions.

e

GABA, 4-aminobutyric acid; C16:1, palmitoleic acid; C16:0, palmitic acid; C18:2, linoleic acid; C18:1n9, oleic acid; C18:0, stearic acid.

f

Internal standard.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The GC–TOF–MS data were normalized using unit variance scaling. Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS–DA) were performed using SIMCA package 14.1 software (Umetrics, Ume, Sweden). The predictability and goodness of fit of the OPLS–DA model were assessed using Q2 and R2Y, respectively, where values exceeding 0.5 indicated significant metabolic differences between the two groups. The R2Y and Q2 values ranged from 0 to 1. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test using Prism GraphPad 9.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A p-value less than 0.05 in the Student’s t-test denoted a significant difference between the means of the compared groups. Heat maps were generated using Multi-Experiment Viewer version 4.9.0 (MeV) and pathway enrichment analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst 6.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of 17β-Estradiol Supplementation on Physical Conditions

In this study, we measured the body weight, liver, uterus, and WAT of the mice to assess their physical changes in response to 17β-estradiol supplementation. Body weight was monitored weekly from baseline until sample collection, whereas the liver, uterus, and WAT were weighed during sample collection (Table 2). Sixteen mice with an initial average weight of 20.4 ± 0.5 g were randomly allocated into three groups. Three weeks after surgery, the average body weight of mice in the OVX group was 25.2 ± 0.8 g, which was similar to that of mice in the E2 group (24.6 ± 0.9 g) that underwent the same surgery (Table 2). On the other hand, the average body weight of mice in the OVX group was significantly greater than that of mice in the sham group (22.2 ± 0.8 g, p < 0.001). These results are consistent with previous studies showing that ovariectomized mice gained more body weight compared to sham-operated mice due to decreased systemic metabolism and energy metabolism.17,18

Table 2. Effect of 17β-Estradiol Supplementation for 6 Weeks on General Characteristics of Mice after Surgery (Means ± SD)a.

  sham OVX E2
initial body weight (g) 20.67 ± 0.58 20.02 ± 0.26 20.60 ± 0.32
after surgery body weight (g) 22.15 ± 0.81*** 25.16 ± 0.77 24.56 ± 0.87
final body weight (g) 25.28 ± 0.16*** 28.70 ± 1.48 27.44 ± 1.92
uterus weight (g) 0.18 ± 0.03**** 0.03 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.01***
liver weight (g) 1.25 ± 0.08 1.24 ± 0.05 1.24 ± 0.08
SC-WAT (g) 0.27 ± 0.09**** 0.76 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.14**
PM-WAT (g) 0.48 ± 0.07**** 1.52 ± 0.24 0.84 ± 0.29**
a

**p < 0.01,***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 OVX versus sham or E2. SC-WAT, subcutaneous white adipose tissue; PM-WAT, parametrial white adipose tissue; sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol.

After 6 weeks of 17β-estradiol supplementation in the mice in the E2 group, the body weight, liver, uterus, WAT, and uterine phenotypes of the mice in all groups were confirmed (Figure 1 and Table 2). The evaluation of uterine phenotype to assess the effectiveness of ovariectomy and 17β-estradiol supplementation was successful. The uterine size in the OVX group was dramatically smaller than that in the sham group. The E2 group showed an intermediate size between those of the OVX and sham groups (Figure 1). Uterine weight followed a similar pattern as the observed phenotype: sham group, 0.18 ± 0.03 g (p < 0.0001); OVX group, 0.03 ± 0.02 g; and E2 group, 0.08 ± 0.01 g (p < 0.001; Table 2). These results are consistent with previous findings that estradiol regulates uterine development and ovariectomy causes an atrophic uterine phenotype.1921 The final body weights were as follows: sham group, 25.3 ± 0.2 g; OVX group, 28.7 ± 1.5 g; and E2 group, 27.4 ± 1.9 g. The mice in the OVX group had the highest body weight, whereas those in the sham group had the lowest. SC-WAT and PM-WAT were also highest in the OVX group, followed by the E2 and sham groups. Notably, a significant difference in WAT weight was found between the OVX and E2 groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative uterine phenotype photos of each group (sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol).

The SC-WAT in the E2 group was 0.5 ± 0.1 g (p < 0.01), which was significantly lower than that in the OVX group (0.8 ± 0.0 g). The PM-WAT in the E2 group ((0.8 ± 0.3 g) was also significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that in the OVX group (1.5 ± 0.2 g). By contrast, no significant difference in liver weight was found among the three groups (Table 2). These results are consistent with previous findings that 17β-estradiol supplementation in the OVX model reduces WAT by inducing browning of WAT in mice.2224 Comprehensively, we have shown that the effects of ovariectomy on body weight and uterine development align with those reported in prior research.1721 Furthermore, our study suggests that 17β-estradiol supplementation effectively reduces WAT accumulation in the OVX mouse model.2224

3.2. Metabolite Comparison of Plasma

Metabolomics analysis of the plasma samples collected from the three groups of mice was performed to determine the changes in plasma metabolites under hormone deficiency and supplementation. Using GC–TOF–MS, we identified 44 metabolites in the plasma of the three mouse groups, including 19 amino acids, 8 organic acids, 4 sugars, 3 sugar alcohols, 1 steroid, 5 fatty acids, and 4 other metabolites (Table 3). Applying plasma data to the PCA model resulted in a score plot that separated the data into groups (Figure 2). PCA, an unsupervised statistical technique, was employed to identify differences between metabolic phenotypes.25 The sham group with ovaries and the OVX group without ovaries were separated. The E2 group was differentiated from the other groups due to 17β-estradiol supplementation. These results confirmed the metabolic distinctness of the Sham, OVX, and E2 groups. They also highlighted that the metabolic mechanisms changed with ovary removal and subsequent 17β-estradiol supplementation.

Table 3. Composition and Content (Ratio/g) of Low-Molecular-Weight Metabolites in the Plasma of Mice.

  contents (average ± SD, ratio/g)
compound sham OVX E2
pyruvic acid 1.56 ± 0.56 2.11 ± 0.22 2.42 ± 0.45
lactic acid 81.77 ± 15.37 63.54 ± 7.47 67.6 ± 3.78
alanine 33.03 ± 6.57 23.6 ± 2.60 32.08 ± 4.00
oxalic acid 80.55 ± 22.78 60.6 ± 2.47 59.32 ± 4.47
hydroxybutanoic acid 0.93 ± 0.40 1.31 ± 0.42 1.56 ± 0.27
valine 9.42 ± 2.43 8.47 ± 1.05 17.18 ± 1.33
urea 76.7 ± 14.02 74.14 ± 8.94 95.86 ± 6.85
serine 1.13 ± 0.38 0.83 ± 0.26 0.83 ± 0.25
ethanolamine 0.58 ± 0.13 1.18 ± 0.19 1.31 ± 0.11
glycerol 11.70 ± 1.67 14.68 ± 1.12 13.34 ± 1.96
phosphoric acid 12.4 ± 4.82 10.54 ± 2.34 12.81 ± 2.34
leucine 6.42 ± 1.28 5.67 ± 0.97 12.53 ± 1.85
isoleucine 3.84 ± 0.73 3.20 ± 0.41 7.26 ± 0.95
proline 3.84 ± 1.75 2.79 ± 0.72 8.18 ± 1.41
glycine 4.62 ± 0.78 9.33 ± 1.61 13.87 ± 2.67
succinic acid 2.31 ± 2.20 1.15 ± 0.37 1.42 ± 0.27
fumaric acid 0.23 ± 0.12 0.22 ± 0.04 0.25 ± 0.06
threonine 0.59 ± 0.20 0.44 ± 0.08 0.89 ± 0.17
β-alanine 0.01 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00
malic acid 1.44 ± 0.69 1.30 ± 0.28 1.63 ± 0.33
aspartic acid 0.12 ± 0.03 0.11 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.02
methionine 1.67 ± 0.44 1.17 ± 0.24 2.19 ± 0.58
pyroglutamic acid 9.10 ± 0.98 10.76 ± 1.24 11.16 ± 0.53
cysteine 0.16 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.03
glutamic acid 0.62 ± 0.14 0.59 ± 0.12 0.63 ± 0.11
phenylalanine 1.95 ± 0.24 1.52 ± 0.15 2.35 ± 0.24
asparagine 0.56 ± 0.16 0.35 ± 0.03 0.53 ± 0.11
xylitol 0.09 ± 0.04 0.05 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01
ribitol 0.05 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.00 0.05 ± 0.00
glutamine 7.76 ± 1.19 8.23 ± 0.77 7.24 ± 0.26
citric acid 1.91 ± 0.30 1.86 ± 0.14 1.71 ± 0.09
fructose 0.38 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.04 0.47 ± 0.12
mannose 1.48 ± 0.41 1.76 ± 0.11 1.26 ± 0.26
glucose 75.27 ± 18.19 55.57 ± 1.27 50.24 ± 2.68
lysine 1.29 ± 0.29 1.45 ± 0.13 1.96 ± 0.32
C16:1 (palmitoleic acid) 0.06 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.02
C16:0 (palmitic acid) 1.54 ± 0.33 1.19 ± 0.09 0.97 ± 0.11
inositol 2.31 ± 0.14 2.77 ± 0.33 3.30 ± 0.48
C18:2 (linoleic acid) 0.20 ± 0.05 0.12 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.02
C18:1n9 (oleic acid) 0.36 ± 0.10 0.27 ± 0.05 0.18 ± 0.04
tryptophan 5.70 ± 0.62 6.04 ± 0.54 5.66 ± 0.82
C18:0 (stearic acid) 0.94 ± 0.20 0.61 ± 0.13 0.53 ± 0.12
sucrose 0.03 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01
cholesterol 5.43 ± 1.70 3.54 ± 0.30 3.80 ± 0.32

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Score plot of the PCA model obtained from 44 metabolites in the plasma samples of the mice from the sham, OVX, and E2 groups (yellow, sham; blue, OVX; red, E2). Sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol.

After verifying the metabolic separation of the three groups using PCA, we employed OPLS–DA to precisely assess the metabolic differences between the two groups. OPLS–DA is a supervised statistical method that categorizes variables based on their associations with class identifiers.26 Additionally, a Student’s t-test was performed to verify the significance of the two groups and visualized in a bar graph with metabolites having a p-value below 0.05 (Figure 3). The OPLS–DA model score plot between the OVX and sham groups had an R2Y value of 0.893 and a Q2 value of 0.463. Additionally, Student’s t-test results showed that 10 metabolites were significantly different between the OVX and sham groups (Figure 3A). Compared with the sham group, the OVX group had lower alanine and phenylalanine levels. This result is consistent with the characteristics of amino acid metabolism in the blood of postmenopausal women.27 In addition, the OVX group had lower contents of C18:0 and C18:2 than did the sham group. Previous study has reported that reduced fatty acid metabolism (especially unsaturated fatty acids) is associated with impaired bone metabolism in OVX mouse.28 Consequently, the levels of plasma metabolites changed, depending on the presence or absence of ovariectomy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

OPLS-DA model score plots and Student’s t-test bar graphs based on the 44 metabolites obtained from the plasma samples of the mice from the (A) sham and OVX groups, (B) sham and E2 groups, and (C) OVX and E2 groups. Sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

OPLS–DA analysis of the E2 and Sham groups showed more distinct differences, with an R2Y value of 0.962 and a Q2 value of 0.853. Student’s t-test results revealed significant differences in the levels of 19 metabolites between the E2 and Sham groups. Compared with the sham group, the E2 group had higher levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), such as valine, leucine, and isoleucine (Figure 3B).

In addition, the E2 and OVX groups showed notable differences, as evidenced by their high R2Y and Q2 values of 0.963 and 0.809, respectively. Student’s t-test results revealed significant differences in the levels of 21 metabolites between the E2 and OVX groups. The levels of amino acids, including BCAAs, were significantly higher in the E2 group than in the OVX group (Figure 3C). The plasma metabolite results in the E2 group support the previous finding that low levels of BCAAs in the blood are associated with early menopause in patients with symptoms of estrogen deficiency.29 Comprehensively, the metabolic changes in the plasma due to 17β-estradiol supplementation were greater than those due to the presence or absence of ovarian removal. These results suggest that 17β-estradiol supplementation can alleviate the decrease in plasma BCAA contents caused by estrogen deficiency.

3.3. Metabolite Comparison of Brain

Using GC–TOF–MS, we identified 45 metabolites in the brains of the three groups of mice, including 20 amino acids, 8 organic acids, 4 sugars, 3 sugar alcohols, 1 steroid, 5 fatty acids, and 4 others (Table 4). By applying the brain metabolite data to the PCA model, a score plot was derived that effectively separated the data into groups (Figure 4). Specifically, distinct changes in the metabolite content were observed in each group in the following order: OVX, sham, and E2. This result suggests that the three groups exhibited distinct metabolic profiles, with the most significant variations observed depending on the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol supplementation.

Table 4. Composition and Content (Ratio/g) of Low-Molecular-Weight Metabolites in the Brain of Mice.

  content (Average ± SD, Ratio/g)
compound sham OVX E2
pyruvic acid 0.28 ± 0.06 0.26 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.03
lactic acid 53.33 ± 1.88 46.53 ± 3.83 58.54 ± 2.87
alanine 27.69 ± 1.19 23.38 ± 2.40 31.92 ± 0.79
oxalic acid 31.88 ± 3.81 26.46 ± 2.79 34.67 ± 3.11
hydroxybutanoic acid 0.17 ± 0.05 0.15 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.02
valine 4.19 ± 0.48 3.49 ± 0.34 5.48 ± 0.24
urea 40.83 ± 3.29 37.18 ± 2.22 55.17 ± 5.91
serine 1.87 ± 0.12 1.57 ± 0.09 2.16 ± 0.11
ethanolamine 2.98 ± 0.35 2.14 ± 0.28 4.15 ± 0.47
glycerol 9.48 ± 1.02 8.43 ± 0.66 10.99 ± 1.13
phosphoric acid 80.47 ± 3.12 72.74 ± 6.25 91.33 ± 1.57
leucine 2.45 ± 0.18 1.72 ± 0.28 2.26 ± 0.23
isoleucine 2.54 ± 0.28 1.96 ± 0.23 2.87 ± 0.18
proline 5.77 ± 0.45 6.17 ± 0.27 6.96 ± 0.21
glycine 25.76 ± 3.23 17.81 ± 1.34 31.09 ± 2.20
succinic acid 18.36 ± 2.60 16.55 ± 1.39 23.76 ± 1.43
fumaric acid 2.09 ± 0.29 1.89 ± 0.19 2.86 ± 0.21
threonine 1.19 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.08 1.37 ± 0.03
β-alanine 1.13 ± 0.22 0.65 ± 0.07 1.71 ± 0.05
malic acid 7.80 ± 0.71 7.03 ± 0.51 9.99 ± 0.51
aspartic acid 11.39 ± 0.36 10.71 ± 0.69 13.57 ± 0.45
methionine 1.86 ± 0.23 1.39 ± 0.24 1.95 ± 0.09
pyroglutamic acid 43.76 ± 2.71 38.96 ± 2.67 50.83 ± 2.58
4-Aminobutyric acid 9.49 ± 0.34 7.90 ± 0.61 11.11 ± 0.70
cysteine 1.78 ± 0.31 1.64 ± 0.22 2.50 ± 0.29
glutamic acid 48.85 ± 1.65 45.08 ± 3.38 58.57 ± 3.01
phenylalanine 2.11 ± 0.23 1.89 ± 0.12 2.29 ± 0.13
asparagine 1.21 ± 0.07 1.14 ± 0.05 1.43 ± 0.06
xylitol 0.30 ± 0.03 0.32 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.03
ribitol 0.25 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.01 0.28 ± 0.02
glutamine 18.38 ± 3.26 18.71 ± 2.70 18.11 ± 2.82
citric acid 0.94 ± 0.13 0.99 ± 0.18 1.13 ± 0.13
fructose 1.16 ± 0.33 1.10 ± 0.14 1.20 ± 0.15
mannose 0.02 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00
glucose 0.49 ± 0.16 0.49 ± 0.07 0.50 ± 0.09
lysine 1.41 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.11 1.27 ± 0.04
C16:1 (palmitoleic acid) 0.11 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.02
C16:0 (palmitic acid) 9.96 ± 0.62 8.14 ± 1.44 12.38 ± 0.54
inositol 27.75 ± 0.82 25.71 ± 1.69 30.1 ± 1.69
C18:2 (linoleic acid) 0.08 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01
C18:1n9 (oleic acid) 2.60 ± 0.23 1.62 ± 0.46 3.55 ± 0.44
tryptophan 0.92 ± 0.08 0.95 ± 0.14 0.90 ± 0.09
C18:0 (stearic acid) 9.10 ± 0.45 7.00 ± 1.35 11.28 ± 0.74
sucrose 0.66 ± 0.07 0.49 ± 0.06 1.04 ± 0.05
cholesterol 34.36 ± 1.33 31.16 ± 2.17 35.72 ± 1.75

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Score plot of the PCA model obtained from 45 metabolites in the brain samples of the mice from the sham, OVX, and E2 groups (yellow, Sham; blue, OVX; red, E2;). Sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol.

The OPLS–DA score plot of the OVX and Sham groups was clearly separated by the presence or absence of ovariectomy, unlike in the plasma, with an R2Y value of 0.927 and a Q2 value of 0.689. Student’s t-test results revealed significant differences in the levels of 22 metabolites between the OVX and sham groups (Figure 5A). In the OVX group, low levels of amino acids, such as BCAAs, glucogenic amino acids (methionine and threonine), and ketogenic amino acids (lysine and leucine), were detected. The balance between amino acids and nitrogen is important for the CNS. BCAAs are nitrogen donors in the brain; they are rapidly transported across the BBB and play an important role in metabolic homeostasis.30 Additionally, glucose is used as the main energy source in the brain, whereas ketones serve as an alternative energy source.31 Glucogenic and ketogenic amino acids in the brain are important from the perspective of energy metabolism. Therefore, the decrease in the levels of BCAAs, glucogenic amino acids, and ketogenic amino acids in the OVX group suggested potential metabolic problems related to estrogen deficiency.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

OPLS-DA model score plot and Student’s t-test bar graphs based on the 45 metabolites obtained from the brain samples of the mice from the (A) sham and OVX groups, (B) sham and E2 groups, and (C) OVX and E2 groups. Sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

The sham and E2 groups had R2Y and Q2 values of 0.977 and 0.904, respectively. Student’s t-test results revealed significant differences in the levels of 27 metabolites between the sham and E2 groups (Figure 5B). The levels of most amino acids, organic acids, and fatty acids were higher in the E2 group than in the sham group. Notably, the levels of neuronal and signaling substances, such as aspartic acid, glutamic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glycine, were significantly higher in the E2 group than in the Sham group. Aspartic acid, which is primarily concentrated in the mouse pituitary gland, facilitates the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone from the hypothalamus.32 Glutamic acid serves as an excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS and plays vital roles in cognitive, memory, and learning functions.33 Furthermore, GABA is a primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. Together with glutamic acid, an excitatory neurotransmitter, it regulates the balance between inhibition and excitation essential for brain function.34,35 Glycine is a major neurotransmitter that acts on the CNS.35 These results suggest that 17β-estradiol supplementation can increase neurotransmitter levels, potentially affecting brain function and hormonal regulation.

The difference was even greater between the OVX and E2 groups. The OPLS–DA score plot of the E2 and OVX groups was clearly separated by the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol supplementation, with an R2Y value of 0.99 and a Q2 value of 0.921. Student’s t-test results revealed significant differences in the levels of 31 metabolites (Figure 5C). Compared with the OVX group, the E2 group had significantly higher levels of BCAAs, glucogenic amino acids, ketogenic amino acids, ketone bodies (hydroxybutanoic acid), neurotransmitters, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates. In particular, unlike the plasma, the brains of the E2 group had higher contents of fatty acids and TCA cycle intermediates. This phenomenon appears to be closely related to the thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue (BAT). BAT is regulated by the central and peripheral nervous systems and plays an important role in stimulating thermogenesis.13 In BAT thermogenesis, fatty acids act as the main energy source and help reduce body fat by browning white fat.22,23 In the present study, the E2 group had a WAT weight significantly lower than that of the OVX group (Table 2). These results suggest that 17β-estradiol supplementation can stimulate the CNS and promote BAT thermogenesis, thereby reducing WAT weight. Furthermore, TCA cycle activity is highly correlated with fatty acid absorption and oxidation.36,37 Therefore, an increase in the levels of TCA-cyclic metabolites and fatty acids in the brain suggests active fatty acid absorption and oxidation in the brain through the TCA cycle. Comprehensively, 17β-estradiol supplementation impacts neurotransmitter levels and stimulates the CNS. Furthermore, it influences BAT thermogenesis and potentially affects TCA cycle activity, fatty acid uptake, and oxidation in the brain. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the complex metabolic changes in the brain associated with estrogen deficiency and supplementation in mice.

3.4. Energy Metabolism due to 17β-Estradiol Supplementation in an OVX Mouse Model

Supplementation of 17β-estradiol to the OVX mouse model significantly increased metabolic levels in the plasma and brain. Pathway and enrichment analyses were performed to investigate the significance of metabolic changes in serum and brain affected by 17β-estradiol supplementation in the OVX mouse model (Figure S1). Thirty-two metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in the plasma of mice in the OVX and E2 groups (p < 0.05). Among them, the pathways of valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis and phenylalanine metabolism were the most significantly enriched (p < 0.001) (Figure S1A). Furthermore, in the brain of mice in the OVX and E2 groups, there was an enrichment of significant metabolites in thirty-seven metabolic pathways (Figure S1B). Five metabolic pathways are quite noteworthy: β-alanine metabolism, d-amino acid metabolism, valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, alanine, aspartate, and glutamine metabolism, and TCA cycle (p < 0.01).

Figure 6 shows an overview of metabolites of significant pathways based on previous analysis results. The metabolic differences related to energy metabolism are shown (Figure 6). β-Alanine significantly increased in the plasma and brain of the E2 group. β-Alanine is a component of carnosine that inhibits skeletal muscle-related aging, and an increase in β-alanine increases muscle carnosine content.38 Carnosine neutralizes age-related neurodegenerative diseases and helps stabilize the nervous system by regulating the neurotransmitter system.39 Therefore, 17β-estradiol supplementation appears to enhance β-alanine activity, suggesting potential benefits for muscle and nervous system health. β-Alanine is produced from aspartic and fumaric acid. Aspartic acid was significantly increased in both the plasma and brain of the E2 group. However, TCA cycle intermediates, including fumaric acid, did not show significant changes in the plasma of the E2 group (Figure 6). Thus, it is insufficient to explain the relationship between 17β-estradiol supplementation and energy metabolism. In contrast to the plasma, the brain of the E2 group showed significant increases in the levels of TCA cycle intermediates, such as malic, fumaric, and succinic acid. Serving as the primary metabolic pathway that fuels the body, the TCA cycle generates approximately two-thirds of the total energy in the body.40 In addition, the levels of amino acids, such as isoleucine, threonine, and methionine, which produce acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA, were increased in the brain samples from mice in the E2 group (Figure 6). Amino acid deamination produces intermediates of the TCA cycle. Ultimately, each cycle intermediate helps create the next intermediate, and amino acids help create intermediates, thereby activating the entire cycle. Decreased metabolic activity is closely associated with the development of various diseases, such as metabolic syndrome and diabetes, which occur during menopause.41,42 These results suggest that supplying 17β-estradiol in a state of estrogen deficiency activates metabolism. This is consistent with previous studies showing that 17β-estradiol supplementation in postmenopausal women activates metabolic regions of the brain.43 In the present study, 17β-estradiol supplementation in estrogen-deficient models notably increased the energy metabolism in the plasma and brain. The meticulous examination of brain metabolites revealed noteworthy elevations in the levels of TCA cycle intermediates and associated amino acids. This comprehensive brain metabolite analysis indicates the robust activation of pivotal metabolic pathways responsible for generating a substantial portion of the body’s energy.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Overview of metabolic alteration in serum and brain affected by 17β-estradiol supplementation in the OVX mouse model. Metabolites with p < 0.05 are shown in normalized data using UV scaling. UV scaling values range from −1.0 to 1.0. Each square is represented as the mean of the normalized data. Red indicates normalized values greater than 0, blue or green indicates normalized values less than 0, and gray indicates undetected metabolites. Sham, sham-operated mice; OVX, ovariectomized mice; and E2, ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol.

In conclusion, the effects of 17β-estradiol supplementation on the plasma and brain metabolites of OVX mice were successfully evaluated using metabolomics techniques. After 6 weeks of 17β-estradiol supplementation, reduction of WAT and recovery of atrophic uterus were confirmed through body weight and uterine phenotype. Metabolic differences were confirmed by using multivariate analysis. In particular, the OPLS–DA model revealed statistically significant differences between the OVX and E2 groups. In the plasma, the E2 group had higher amino acid levels than did the OVX group. In the brain, the E2 group had significantly higher contents of metabolites including TCA cycle intermediates, neurotransmitters, amino acids, and fatty acids. This study is the first to reveal differences in energy metabolism induced by 17β-estradiol supplementation through brain metabolic profiling of OVX mice, underscoring the importance of brain tissue metabolic profiling in menopausal hormone research. It may also serve as a basis for further studies of brain metabolic profiles under varied hormonal supplementation conditions.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (no. NRF-2022M3H9A2082952) and Republic of Korea and Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2022R1A6A3A01087368), Republic of Korea.

Glossary

ABBREVIATIONS

Sham

sham-operated mice

OVX

ovariectomized mice

E2

ovariectomized mice that received twice-weekly supplementation of 17β-estradiol

BCAA

branched-chain amino acid

MHT

menopausal hormone therapy

BBB

blood-brain barrier

SC-WAT

subcutaneous white adipose tissue

PM-WAT

parametrial white adipose tissue

BAT

brown adipose tissue

PCA

principal component analysis

OPLS-DA

orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis

CNS

central nervous system

TCA

tricarboxylic acid

GC-TOF-MS

gas chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry

GABA

4-aminobutyric acid

C16:1

palmitoleic acid

C16:0

palmitic acid

C18:2

linoleic acid

C18:1n9

oleic acid

C18:0

stearic acid

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c10399.

  • Pathway and enrichment analyses in serum and brain affected by 17β-estradiol supplementation in the OVX mouse model (PDF)

Author Contributions

# S.H.Y. and Y.J.K. have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. S.H.Y. performed formal analysis, data curation, and writing–original draft. Y.J.K. performed methodology, formal analysis, and writing–review. H.R.Y. and S.U.P. performed methodology and resource gathering. J.G.K performed conceptualization, resource gathering, supervision, and writing–review and editing. J.K.K. performed conceptualization, supervision, and writing–review and editing.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao3c10399_si_001.pdf (224.7KB, pdf)

References

  1. Prossnitz E. R.; Arterburn J. B. International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. XCVII. G protein–coupled estrogen receptor and its pharmacologic modulators. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 505–540. 10.1124/pr.114.009712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Khadilkar S. S. Musculoskeletal disorders and menopause. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India. 2019, 69, 99–103. 10.1007/s13224-019-01213-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mauvais-Jarvis F.; Clegg D. J.; Hevener A. L. The role of estrogens in control of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Endocr. Rev. 2013, 34, 309–338. 10.1210/er.2012-1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fontana R.; Della Torre S.; Meda C.; Longo A.; Eva C.; Maggi A. C. Estrogen replacement therapy regulation of energy metabolism in female mouse hypothalamus. Endocrinology. 2014, 155, 2213–2221. 10.1210/en.2013-1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mahboobifard F.; Pourgholami M. H.; Jorjani M.; Dargahi L.; Amiri M.; Sadeghi S.; Tehrani F. R. Estrogen as a key regulator of energy homeostasis and metabolic health. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 156, 113808 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho L.; Kaunitz A. M.; Faubion S. S.; Hayes S. N.; Lau E. S.; Pristera N.; Scott N.; Shifren J. L.; Shufelt C. L.; Stuenkel C. A.; Lindley K. J. ACC CVD in Women Committee. Rethinking menopausal hormone therapy: for whom, what, when, and how long?. Circ. 2023, 147, 597–610. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pan M.; Pan X.; Zhou J.; Wang J.; Qi Q.; Wang L. Update on hormone therapy for the management of postmenopausal women. BioSci. Trends. 2022, 16, 46–57. 10.5582/bst.2021.01418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koebele S. V.; Bimonte-Nelson H. A. Modeling menopause: The utility of rodents in translational behavioral endocrinology research. Maturitas. 2016, 87, 5–17. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vasilopoulou C. G.; Margarity M.; Klapa M. I. Metabolomic analysis in brain research: opportunities and challenges. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 183. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hampl R.; Bičíková M.; Sosvorová L. Hormones and the blood-brain barrier. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2015, 21, 159–164. 10.1515/hmbci-2014-0042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haddad-Tóvolli R.; Dragano N. R. V.; Ramalho A. F. S.; Velloso L. A. Development and function of the blood-brain barrier in the context of metabolic control. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 224. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Serlin Y.; Shelef I.; Knyazer B.; Friedman A. Anatomy and physiology of the blood–brain barrier. Semin cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 38, 2–6. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu Y.; López M. Central regulation of energy metabolism by estrogens. Mol. Metab. 2018, 15, 104–115. 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yilmaz O.; Yagci A.; Ulutas E.; Sevimli A.; Altunbas K.; Bulbul A.; Aslan R. The effect of 17β estradiol on the expression of eNOS and iNOS in ovariectomized rat uterus. Eur. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 29, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei Z.; Ge F.; Che Y.; Wu S.; Dong X.; Song D. Metabolomics coupled with pathway analysis provides insights into sarco-osteoporosis metabolic alterations and estrogen therapeutic effects in mice. Biomolecules. 2022, 12, 41. 10.3390/biom12010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Song N.; Jeong D. Y.; Tu T. H.; Park B. S.; Yang H. R.; Kim Y. J.; Kim J. K.; Park J. T.; Yeh J. Y.; Yang S.; Kim J. G. Adiponectin controls nutrient availability in hypothalamic astrocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1587. 10.3390/ijms22041587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Babaei P.; Dastras A.; Tehrani B. S.; Pourali Roudbaneh S. The effect of estrogen replacement therapy on visceral fat, serum glucose, lipid profiles and apelin level in ovariectomized rats. J. Menopausal Med. 2017, 23, 182–189. 10.6118/jmm.2017.23.3.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lopez M.; Tena-Sempere M. Estradiol and brown fat. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 30, 527–536. 10.1016/j.beem.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding L. C.; Gong Q. Q.; Li S. W.; Fu X. L.; Jin Y. C.; Zhang J.; Gao J. G.; Sun X. Y. Rcan2 and estradiol independently regulate body weight in female mice. Oncotarget. 2017, 8, 48098. 10.18632/oncotarget.18259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Barton B. E.; Herrera G. G.; Anamthathmakula P.; Rock J. K.; Willie A. M.; Harris E. A.; Takemaru K. I.; Winuthayanon W. Roles of steroid hormones in oviductal function. Reprod. 2020, 159, R125–R137. 10.1530/REP-19-0189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McGlade E. A.; Herrera G. G.; Stephens K. K.; Olsen S. L. W.; Winuthayanon S.; Guner J.; Hewitt S. C.; Korach K. S.; DeMayo F. J.; Lydon J. P.; Monsivais D.; Winuthayanon W. Cell-type specific analysis of physiological action of estrogen in mouse oviducts. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21563 10.1096/fj.202002747R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Contreras C.; Gonzalez F.; Fernø J.; Diéguez C.; Rahmouni K.; Nogueiras R.; López M. The brain and brown fat. Ann. Med. 2015, 47, 150–168. 10.3109/07853890.2014.919727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Contreras C.; Nogueiras R.; Diéguez C.; Medina-Gómez G.; López M. Hypothalamus and thermogenesis: heating the BAT, browning the WAT. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 438, 107–115. 10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ponnusamy S.; Tran Q. T.; Harvey I.; Smallwood H. S.; Thiyagarajan T.; Banerjee S.; Johnson D. L.; Dalton J. T.; Sullivan R. D.; Miller D. D.; Bridges D.; Narayanan R. Pharmacologic activation of estrogen receptor β increases mitochondrial function, energy expenditure, and brown adipose tissue. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 266. 10.1096/fj.201600787rr. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Park Y. J.; Kim Y. J.; Park S. U.; Kim H. Y.; Yang J. Y.; Song S. Y.; Lee M. J.; Seo W. D.; Kim J. K. Lipids and volatile organic compounds in sesame seeds and their relationships with environmental temperature-induced stress. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112831 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bujak R.; Daghir-Wojtkowiak E.; Kaliszan R.; Markuszewski M. J. PLS-based and regularization-based methods for the selection of relevant variables in non-targeted metabolomics data. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2016, 3, 35. 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Auro K.; Joensuu A.; Fischer K.; Kettunen J.; Salo P.; Mattsson H.; Niironen M.; Kaprio J.; Eriksson J. G.; Lehtimäki T.; Raitakari O.; Jula A.; Tiitinen A.; Jauhiainen M.; Soininen P.; Kangas A. J.; Kähönen M.; Havulinna A. S.; Ala-korpela M.; Salomaa V.; Metspalu A.; Perola M. A metabolic view on menopause and ageing. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4708. 10.1038/ncomms5708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ye M.; Zhang C.; Jia W.; Shen Q.; Qin X.; Zhang H.; Zhu L. Metabolomics strategy reveals the osteogenic mechanism of yak (Bos grunniens) bone collagen peptides on ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1498–1512. 10.1039/C9FO01944H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo X.; Zhu Y.; Guo L.; Qi Y.; Liu X.; Wang J.; Zhang J.; Cui L.; Shi Y.; Wang Q.; Liu C.; Lu G.; Liu Y.; Li T.; Hong S.; Qin Y.; Xiong X.; Wu H.; Huang L.; Huang H.; Gu C.; Li B.; Li J. BCAA insufficiency leads to premature ovarian insufficiency via ceramide-induced elevation of ROS. EMBO Mol. Med. 2023, 15, e17450 10.15252/emmm.202317450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sperringer J. E.; Addington A.; Hutson S. M. Branched-chain amino acids and brain metabolism. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 1697–1709. 10.1007/s11064-017-2261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kapogiannis D.; Avgerinos K. I. Brain glucose and ketone utilization in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2020, 154, 79–110. 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Di Fiore M. M.; Santillo A.; Falvo S.; Chieffi Baccari G.; Venditti M.; Di Giacomo Russo F.; Lispi M.; D’Aniello A. Sex hormone levels in the brain of d-aspartate-treated rats. C. R. Biol. 2017, 341, 9–15. 10.1016/j.crvi.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Aizawa S.; Sakai T.; Sakata I.. The role of glutamine and glutamic acid in the pituitary gland involvement in thyroid-stimulating hormone release. InGlutamine in Clinical Nutrition. Nutrition and Health. Rajendram R., Preedy V., Patel V., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, 2015; pp 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu C.; Sun D. GABA receptors in brain development, function, and injury. Metab. Brain Dis. 2015, 30, 367–379. 10.1007/s11011-014-9560-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Patri M.Synaptic transmission and amino acid neurotransmitters. In Neurochemical Basis of Brain Function and Dysfunction; IntechOpen: London, 2019; ISBN 9781789859997. [Google Scholar]
  36. Choi I.; Son H.; Baek J. H. Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates: regulators of immune responses. Life. 2021, 11, 69. 10.3390/life11010069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Miao Y.; Liu J.; Wang X.; Liu B.; Liu W.; Tao Y. Fatty acid feedstocks enable a highly efficient glyoxylate-TCA cycle for high-yield production of β-alanine. MLife. 2022, 1, 171–182. 10.1002/mlf2.12006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthews J. J.; Artioli G. G.; Turner M. D.; Sale C. The physiological roles of carnosine and β-alanine in exercising human skeletal muscle. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 2019, 51, 2098–2108. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Banerjee S.; Poddar M. K. Carnosine research in relation to aging brain and neurodegeneration: A blessing for geriatrics and their neuronal disorders. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020, 91, 104239 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Akram M. Citric acid cycle and role of its intermediates in metabolism. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 68, 475–478. 10.1007/s12013-013-9750-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Caretto M.; Giannini A.; Palla G.; Simoncini T.. Metabolic changes at the menopausal transition. InImpact of Polycystic Ovary, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity on Women Health. ISGE Series. 8nd ed.; Genazzani A. R., Ibáñez L., Milewicz A., Shah D., Ed.; Springer, Cham, 2021; pp 191–204. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stachowiak G.; Pertyński T.; Pertyńska-Marczewska M. Metabolic disorders in menopause. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015, 14, 59–64. 10.5114/pm.2015.50000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Silverman D. H.; Geist C. L.; Kenna H. A.; Williams K.; Wroolie T.; Powers B.; Brooks J.; Rasgon N. L. Differences in regional brain metabolism associated with specific formulations of hormone therapy in postmenopausal women at risk for AD. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011, 36, 502–513. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao3c10399_si_001.pdf (224.7KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES