Table 1.
Comparison of different methods on the dataset, with affine registration used for reference.
| Method | Dice (%) | |JD ≤ 0| |
|---|---|---|
| Affine Only | 56.33 0.04 | - |
| VoxelMorph-1 | 73.07 0.04 | 186 38 |
| VoxelMorph-2 | 73.94 0.05 | 392 69 |
| SYMNet | 71.89 0.31 | 0.5 0.4 |
| LapIRN | 71.43 0.04 | 0 |
| LapIRNdisp | 74.89 0.18 | 1757 259 |
| MF-Net (ours) | 75.38 0.05 | 332 22 |
Dice measures registration accuracy (higher values are better), and |JD ≤ 0| indicates the number of folding voxels that do not conform to the anatomical structure. Please note that the best-performing results are highlighted in bold.