Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 12;18:1364409. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1364409

Table 1.

Comparison of different methods on the dataset, with affine registration used for reference.

Method Dice (%) |JD ≤ 0|
Affine Only 56.33 ± 0.04 -
VoxelMorph-1 73.07 ± 0.04 186 ± 38
VoxelMorph-2 73.94 ± 0.05 392 ± 69
SYMNet 71.89 ± 0.31 0.5 ± 0.4
LapIRN 71.43 ± 0.04 0
LapIRNdisp 74.89 ± 0.18 1757 ± 259
MF-Net (ours) 75.38 ± 0.05 332 ± 22

Dice measures registration accuracy (higher values are better), and |JD ≤ 0| indicates the number of folding voxels that do not conform to the anatomical structure. Please note that the best-performing results are highlighted in bold.