Table 4. ARRDC3 and NFIA risk allele frequencies in 46 breed groups of US cattle.
Risk allele frequency b | Animals in each group | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease risk d | Breeding rank e | ||||||||||
Breed group a | Animals typed | ARRDC3 (BCHF5) | NFIA (BCHF2) c | 1× | 8× | 28× | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Angus | 30 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 9 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
Ankole-Watusi | 20 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Ayrshire | 24 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Beefmaster | 29 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 13 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 0 |
Belgian Blue | 24 | 0.19 | 0.85 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 |
Blonde d'Aquitaine | 24 | 0.06 | 0.42 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Brahman | 29 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brahmousin | 24 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Brangus | 29 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 2 |
Braunvieh | 28 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Brown Swiss | 24 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Charolais | 30 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
Chianina | 28 | 0.18 | 0.54 | 17 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1 |
Corriente | 27 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Devon | 23 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Dexter | 24 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Gelbvieh | 29 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
Guernsey | 24 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Hereford | 30 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 13 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 0 |
Highland | 24 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Holstein | 23 | 0.09 | 0.63 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
Indu-Brazil | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jersey | 38 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Limousin | 30 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Maine-Anjou | 29 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 1 |
Marchgianna | 23 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Mini Hereford | 24 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 7 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 5 |
Mini Zebu | 24 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Montbeliard | 24 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Murray Gray | 24 | 0.71 | 0.42 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 2 |
Nelore | 24 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Piedmontese | 24 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Pinzgauer | 24 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Red Angus | 30 | 0.73 | 0.42 | 12 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 10 | 2 |
Red Poll | 24 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 3 |
Romagnola | 24 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Salers | 29 | 0.09 | 0.36 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Santa Gertrudis | 28 | 0.18 | 0.43 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Senepol | 24 | 0.02 | 0.65 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Shorthorn | 29 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
Simmental | 30 | 0.13 | 0.42 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
Tarentaise | 28 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
T. Longhorn, MARC | 28 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
T. Longhorn, CTLR | 23 | 0.04 | 0.61 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Tuli | 23 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wagyu | 24 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
Registered cattle chosen for minimal pedigree relationships (Heaton et al., 2016).
The risk allele definitions are listed in Table 2.
Note that the LD is only moderate (r 2 ~ 0.47) between BCHF2 (BovineHD0300024366) and the SNPs most associated NFIA: BCHF31 (BovineHD0300024307), and BCHF32 (BovineHD0300024308). Thus, the BCHF2 allele values in this table are rough estimates of those for BCHF31 and BCHF32.
As described in Table 3.
As described in Table 3.