Table 3.
Identified facilitators | Physicians (n = 5) | Therapists (n = 7) | Other (n = 2) |
---|---|---|---|
Organisation | |||
Sufficient personnel resources | x | x | x |
Optimisation of patient pathway | x | x | x |
Standardised structures and organisation of prehabilitation | x | x | x |
Use of IT and technology | x | x | |
More planning time for prehabilitation | x | x | x |
Compressed documentation | x | x | |
Concept of the SDM Conferences | x | x | x |
Implementation of prehabilitation in regular care | x | x | |
Communication and cooperation | |||
Good communication between professionals | x | x | x |
Fixed contact person/permanent team | x | x | x |
Close cooperation between different professional groups | x | x | x |
Prehabilitation | |||
Positive impact of prehabilitation on patients | x | x | x |
Committed patients | x | ||
Well trained therapists | x | ||
Longer prehabilitation period + fewer units per week | x | x | |
Individual therapy design | x | x | |
Multimodal prehabilitation | x | x | x |
One hour therapy time | x | ||
Choice of setting (outpatient/inpatient/partial inpatient/home visits) | x | x | x |
Manual for therapists | x | ||
Proof of evidence | x |
An ‘x’ indicates that this theme was at least once mentioned by the respective professional group