Table 1.
Summary table of individual ordination results
| Win–win | Ecological-win | Yield-win | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable |
|
|
|
| Herbicides | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mechanical weeding | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Phosphorus inputs | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leaf area index | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum height | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Vegetation gaps | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Vegetation complexity | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Forest % | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Rubber % | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Young oil palm % | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Displayed is how often the 10 environmental variables that describe management (three variables), vegetation structure (four variables), or landscape context (three variables) were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated to the Top Right Quadrant (win–wins), Top Quadrants (ecological wins) or the Right Quadrants (yield-wins) in a total of 11 individual ordination plots fitted for each ecological indicator dataset.