Table 2.
Characteristics Analyzed | Advantages of ASL | Advantages of DSA | Disadvantages of ASL | Disadvantages of DSA |
---|---|---|---|---|
Endogenous Tracer Usage (water) | ++ | − | − | Contrast agent required; risk of complications |
Safety as a Noninvasive Alternative | + | − | − | Invasive procedure; potential for vascular complications |
Functional AVM Assessment | Provides functional assessment | − | Reduced reliability for venous drainage assessment (spin inversion) | Limited functional information; anatomical focus |
Identification of Arterial Feeders | −/+ | − | Difficulty in detecting AVMs in specific locations | Excellent identification of arterial feeders; comprehensive view |
Characterization of Low-Flow Segments | − | − | Underestimation of total blood flow in AVMs | May not provide detailed information on low-flow segments |
Mitigation of Overestimation Risk | −/+ | − | Limitations in the immediate postintervention period | Potential for overestimation due to strong contrast agent injection |
Identification Despite Mass Effect | − | − | Challenges in interpretation due to inhomogeneities | Excellent for overcoming mass effect; direct visualization |
+ (moderate advantages), ++ (strong advantages), −/+ (indifferente) and – (not reported).