Table 9.
Correlation analyses on the studied constructs (N = 1820).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 WKL | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 CONFL | 0.342 | *** | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 WFC | 0.602 | *** | 0.335 | *** | _ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 TECHNO | 0.394 | *** | 0.238 | *** | 0.440 | *** | __ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 EASD | 0.414 | *** | 0.382 | *** | 0.384 | *** | 0.339 | *** | __ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 ESD | 0.265 | *** | 0.073 | 0.290 | *** | 0.257 | *** | 0.340 | *** | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 ECD | 0.348 | *** | 0.489 | *** | 0.345 | *** | 0.344 | *** | 0.471 | *** | 0.303 | *** | __ | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8 SUP | −0.184 | *** | −0.462 | *** | −0.206 | *** | −0.178 | *** | −0.321 | *** | 0.004 | −0.314 | *** | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
| 9 COL SUPP | −0.176 | *** | −0.536 | *** | −0.233 | *** | −0.189 | *** | −0.279 | *** | −0.044 | −0.549 | *** | 0.526 | *** | __ | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 AUT | −0.164 | *** | −0.281 | *** | −0.239 | *** | −0.242 | *** | −0.383 | *** | −0.232 | *** | −0.274 | *** | 0.320 | *** | 0.333 | *** | __ | |||||||||||||
| 11 ID ORG | −0.001 | −0.117 | *** | 0.015 | −0.047 | −0.164 | *** | −0.015 | −0.118 | *** | 0.222 | *** | 0.192 | *** | 0.228 | *** | __ | |||||||||||||||
| 12 COM | −0.293 | *** | −0.484 | *** | −0.274 | *** | −0.237 | *** | −0.427 | *** | −0.126 | ** | −0.410 | *** | 0.580 | *** | 0.441 | *** | 0.415 | *** | 0.233 | *** | __ | |||||||||
| 13 ENV | −0.204 | *** | −0.212 | *** | −0.201 | *** | −0.184 | *** | −0.262 | *** | −0.179 | *** | −0.235 | *** | 0.211 | *** | 0.253 | *** | 0.341 | *** | 0.218 | *** | 0.321 | *** | __ | |||||||
| 14 JUST | −0.216 | *** | −0.258 | *** | −0.192 | *** | −0.113 | *** | −0.315 | *** | −0.067 | −0.287 | *** | 0.291 | *** | 0.273 | *** | 0.293 | *** | 0.283 | *** | 0.359 | *** | 0.266 | *** | |||||||
| 15 ORG SUPP | −0.293 | *** | −0.413 | *** | −0.374 | *** | −0.262 | *** | −0.429 | *** | −0.209 | ** | −0.358 | *** | 0.473 | *** | 0.444 | *** | 0.464 | *** | 0.341 | *** | 0.479 | *** | 0.358 | *** | 0.338 | *** | __ | |||
| 16 BURN | 0.350 | *** | 0.380 | *** | 0.439 | *** | 0.328 | *** | 0.425 | *** | 0.298 | *** | 0.386 | *** | −0.311 | *** | −0.310 | *** | −0.393 | *** | −0.291 | *** | −0411 | *** | −0.233 | *** | −0.312 | *** | −0.444 | *** | __ | |
| 17 ENG | −0.213 | *** | −0.367 | *** | −0.232 | *** | −0.260 | *** | −0.435 | *** | −0.248 | *** | −0.363 | *** | 0.363 | *** | 0.349 | *** | 0.443 | *** | 0.456 | *** | 0.436 | *** | 0.296 | *** | 0.353 | *** | 0.464 | *** | −0.574 | *** |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 1. WKL, Workload; 2. CONFL, Dysfunctional Relationship; 3. WFC, Work–family conflict; 4. TECHNO, Technostressors; 5. EASD, Excessive academic staff’s demands; 6. ESD, Excessive students’ demands; 7. ECD, Excessive colleagues’ demands → Job Demands; 8. SUP, Hierarchical Superior’s support; 9. COL SUPP, Colleagues’ support; 10. AUT, Decisional Autonomy; 11. ID ORG, Organizational identification; 12. COM, Communication; 13. ENV, Comfort of university environments; 14. JUST, Distributive justice; 15. ORG SUPP, Organizational support for work-life balance → Job Resources; 16. BURN, Burnout (Emotional Exhaustion and Detachment); 17. ENG, Work Engagement (Vigor and Dedication); → Outcomes Overall scores on the scales were considered for correlation analyses. Sample size may vary due to missing data and to the specificity of some scales targeted on a subsample of participants, the sample size ranging from 174 to 1783.