Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 17;13(8):1230. doi: 10.3390/foods13081230

Table 2.

Protein recovery, protein concentration, peptide concentration, and antioxidant activity of CS protein hydrolysate.

Extraction Time (min) Protein Recovery (mg/g CS) Decrease in Protein Concentration (mg/mL) Increase in Peptide Concentration (mg/mL) Increase in Antioxidant Activity
(µmole TE/mL)
ABTS DPPH FRAP
Conventional alkaline extraction (CAE) *
240 12.26 ± 0.96 d 0.730 ± 0.017 b 0.261 ± 0.006 a 0.834 ± 0.016 a 0.891 ± 0.015 a 0.615 ± 0.001 a
Ultrasound-assisted alkaline extraction (UAE) **
10 13.06 ± 0.71 d 0.879 ± 0.005 ab 0.269 ± 0.009 a 1.073 ± 0.015 a 1.038 ± 0.008 a 0.607 ± 0.009 a
25 18.31 ± 0.22 c 0.733 ± 0.011 b 0.240 ± 0.004 b 0.752 ± 0.081 b 0.640 ± 0.012 b 0.224 ± 0.007 b
40 18.60 ± 0.36 c 0.679 ± 0.010 c 0.177 ± 0.052 c 0.507 ± 0.030 c 0.264 ± 0.009 c 0.041 ± 0.006 c
Microwave-assisted alkaline extraction (MAE) ***
2 12.19 ± 0.39 d 0.902 ± 0.090 a 0.357 ± 0.020 a 1.418 ± 0.002 a 1.258 ± 0.051 a 0.858 ± 0.052 a
5 20.06 ± 0.39 b 0.701 ± 0.016 b 0.247 ± 0.008 b 1.028 ± 0.028 b 0.877 ± 0.051 b 0.521 ± 0.002 b
10 21.77 ± 0.32 a 0.512 ± 0.042 d 0.144 ± 0.001 d 1.007 ± 0.035 b 0.806 ± 0.006 b 0.451 ± 0.021 b

* Conventional alkaline extraction was performed at 50 °C. ** Ultrasound-assisted alkaline extraction was performed using 80% amplitude. *** Microwave-assisted alkaline extraction was performed using 90 W electric power. The experiments are performed in triplicate (n = 3). The results are reported as mean  ±  SD. Different letters (a–d) within columns are significantly different at p  <  0.05 according to analysis by Duncan’s multiple range test.