Table 2.
Question | n (Panelists) 1 | Mean (95% CI) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | At present, it is unclear whether different forms of B12 differ in their effectiveness or safety. Clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of the commercially available forms are needed. | 42 | 0.88 (0.74–0.96) |
2. | Regarding the use of prophylactic B12 supplementation: | ||
|
41 | 0.85 (0.71–0.94) | |
|
41 | 0.85 (0.71–0.94) | |
|
41 | 0.90 (0.77–0.97) | |
|
42 | 0.83 (0.69–0.93) | |
|
39 | 0.85 (0.69–0.94) | |
3. | There is no one-size-fits-all regarding the dose of B12, the frequency and the route of B12 therapy in people with B12 deficiency. Regarding the decision on the route of B12 administration: | ||
|
38 | 0.87 (0.72–0.96) | |
|
32 | 0.75 (0.57–0.89) | |
|
40 | 0.78 (0.62–0.89) | |
4. | If B12 treatment fails in symptomatic patients, one or more of the following measures are recommended: | ||
|
40 | 0.98 (0.87–0.999) | |
|
39 | 0.95 (0.83–0.99) | |
|
38 | 0.87 (0.72–0.96) | |
5. | B12 deficiency during pregnancy, lactation and in infancy needs to be detected and treated as early as possible because of the serious effects of B12 deficiency on fetal and infant development. | 38 | 0.89 (0.75–0.97) |
6. | Women with a previously diagnosed B12 deficiency or dietary restriction of animal foods should take prophylactic B12 supplementation from pre-pregnancy to the end of the lactation period. | 38 | 0.92 (0.79–0.98) |
1 Total number of the panelists who answered each of the questions. 2 Mean percentage and the 95% confidence intervals of the panelists who considered themselves qualified to answer the question and chose “agree” or “strongly agree” to the answer. We considered that a consensus was reached when the lower bound of the 95%confidence intervals is 50% or higher.