Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 18;15(4):505. doi: 10.3390/genes15040505

Table 3.

Descriptive Statistics of Genetic Diagnosis Identified Across Relevant Variables.

Genetic Diagnosis Identified
Variable No Yes X2/Exact or Kruskal-Wallis Test p-Value
Sex
Female 321/443 (72.5% 122/442 (27.5%) p = 0.0235
Male 448/570 (78.6%) 122/570 (21.4%)
Age at Consultation (Days) Mean = 17.0 (SD = 43.5)
Median = 3.0 (IQR: [1.0, 10.0])
Mean = 21.6 (SD = 56.6)
Median = 2.0 (IQR: [1.0, 10.0])
p = 0.0586
Age Group
Neonate (0–28 days) 671/880 (76.3%) 209/880 (23.8%) p = 0.5190
Infant (29 days-1 year) 98/133 (73.7%) 35/133 (26.3%)
Race/Ethnicity Group
(Self-Reported)
Asian/Pacific Island 19/25 (76.0%) 6/25 (24.0%) p = 0.8930
Black/African American 97/126 (77.0%) 29/126 (23.0%)
Hispanic/Latino 84/110 (76.4%) 26/110 (23.6%)
Other 2/3 (66.7%) 1/3 (33.3%)
White 532/707 (75.3%) 175/707 (24.8%)
Unknown/Declined 35/42 (83.3%) 7/42 (16.7%)
CHD Class
APVR 24/28 (85.7%) 4/28 (14.3%) p < 0.0001 *
AVSD 17/37 (45.9%) 20/37 (54.1%)
Complex 99/132 (75.0%) 33/132 (25.0%)
Conotruncal 186/249 (74.7%) 63/249 (25.3%)
Heterotaxy/Laterality Spectrum 64/73 (87.7%) 9/73 (12.3%)
LVOTO 212/260 (81.5%) 48/260 (18.5%)
RVOTO 77/98 (78.6%) 21/98 (21.4%)
Septal 90/136 (66.2%) 46/136 (33.8%)
ECA Status
No 502/580 (86.6%) 78/580 (13.5%) p < 0.0001
Yes 267/433 (61.7%) 166/433 (38.3%)
Maternal Diabetes Status
(Gestational & Pregestational)
No/Unknown 694/925 (75.0%) 231/925 (25.0%) p = 0.0247
Yes 73/85 (85.9%) 12/85 (14.1%)
Clinical Description at Evaluation
Apparently Isolated/Non-Syndromic 613/667 (91.9%) 54/667 (8.1%) p < 0.0001
Possibly Syndromic CHD 155/242 (64.1%) 87/242 (36.0%)
Confirmed Syndrome at Evaluation 1/104 (0.96%) † 103/104 (99.04%)
Consultation Time Period
2014–2018 256/313 (81.8%) 57/313 (18.2%) p = 0.0084
2019–2022 407/549 (74.1%) 142/549 (25.9%)
2023 106/151 (70.2%) 45/151 (29.8%)
Genetic Testing Ordering Strategy
None 21/22 (95.5%) 1/22 (4.5%) p < 0.0001 **
Prenatal Genetic Testing Only 11/32 (34.4%) 21/32 (65.6%)
Outside Hospital Genetic Testing 5/20 (25.0%) 15/20 (75.0%)
Targeted Cytogenetic Testing Only (FISH, karyotype) 7/45 (15.6%) 38/45 (84.4%)
Chromosomal Microarray (postnatal) 231/292 (79.1%) 61/292 (20.9%)
Targeted Molecular Genetic Testing Only (phenotype-specific/single-gene) 4/12 (33.3%) 8/12 (66.7%)
Chromosome Microarray + Exome-Based Gene Panel/Exome Sequencing 323/380 (85.0%) 57/380 (15.0%)
Genome Sequencing 167/210 (79.5%) 43/210 (20.5%)
Number of Genetic Tests Completed Mean = 1.5 (SD = 0.7)
Median = 1.0 (IQR: [1.0, 2.0])
Mode = 1.0
Range = 4.0
Mean = 1.5 (SD = 0.7)
Median = 1.0 (IQR: [1.0, 2.0])
Mode = 1.0
Range = 3.0
p = 0.2799

* When excluding trisomy 21, AVSD remained the class with largest proportion with a genetic diagnosis identified (n = 11/28, 39.3%); there remained a difference across all CHD classes (p = 0.0030). † This was a primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) clinical diagnosis case confirmed by nasal ciliary biopsy who otherwise had negative genetic testing. A specific genetic diagnosis was not made using genetic testing. The other case of PCD (see footnote in Table 1) was found to have a heterozygous variant and the clinical genetics team considered this diagnostic (while the other allele was assumed to be deeply intronic). ** When limiting genetic testing to CMA-only, CMA plus ES-based panel/ ES, and GS, there was no major difference in diagnostic yields. Proportions of those with diagnostic results include CMA-only (20.9%) CMA plus ES-based panel/ES (15.0%), and GS (20.5%), with p = 0.0929.