Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 15;25(8):4352. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084352

Table 2.

Descriptive Values and Multilevel Modeling Results for Clinical and Cognitive Outcomes Across Time for American Elderberry Juice Intervention (n = 11) vs. Placebo–Control (n = 13).

Baseline 3 Months 6 Months Time Condition Time x Condition
Variable M SD M SD M SD F p F p F p η 2
MMSE 0.72 0.40 0.54 0.63 0.84 0.37 0.02
  Elderberry 25.27 3.29 25.00 2.65 24.00 4.61 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 24.62 3.31 25.27 3.93 25.00 2.79 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Free Recall 0.75 0.39 0.05 0.83 0.00 0.99 0.01
  Elderberry 4.48 1.25 3.74 1.27 4.00 1.01 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 4.04 1.63 4.54 2.09 3.83 1.77 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Delayed Free Recall 0.15 0.70 0.50 0.48 0.41 0.52 0.01
  Elderberry 2.18 2.60 2.56 2.83 1.67 2.29 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 1.46 1.98 2.45 3.39 1.90 3.03 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Recognition # Hits 3.35 0.08 * 0.00 0.96 2.32 0.14 0.05
  Elderberry 11.27 0.79 11.38 0.74 11.14 1.07 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 10.42 1.62 10.73 1.10 9.25 1.91 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Recognition FA-Related 0.56 0.46 0.01 0.91 0.13 0.73 0.01
  Elderberry 2.27 1.79 2.38 2.13 2.86 1.95 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 1.92 2.27 2.55 2.02 1.88 2.10 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Recognition FA-Unrelated 2.08 0.16 0.46 0.50 0.39 0.54 0.01
  Elderberry 0.64 0.81 1.25 1.28 1.29 1.38 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 0.92 1.31 1.27 2.00 1.12 1.73 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
HVLT—Discrimination Index 3.69 0.06 * 0.16 0.99 0.02 0.89 0.01
  Elderberry 8.36 2.58 7.75 3.06 7.00 2.08 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 7.58 3.45 6.91 3.24 6.25 3.45 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
BNT—Total Correct 8.48 0.006 *** 0.84 0.36 0.53 0.47 0.01
  Elderberry 56.45 3.14 57.56 2.30 57.11 3.55 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 55.23 2.83 55.91 4.44 56.55 3.67 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
REY CFT—Copy Total 0.55 0.47 0.17 0.68 0.12 0.74 0.01
  Elderberry 30.55 3.70 29.06 8.15 29.21 3.91 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 27.21 8.84 28.17 6.90 24.81 10.13 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
REY CFT—Delayed Copy Total 0.31 0.58 0.46 0.50 0.58 0.45 0.02
  Elderberry 4.32 7.43 5.12 4.63 3.93 5.56 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 3.29 5.30 2.50 4.89 4.12 5.42 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Anagrams—Total 0.66 0.42 1.60 0.21 1.72 0.20 0.04
  Elderberry 9.91 6.53 8.88 6.81 9.67 6.10 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 6.85 3.85 10.18 3.74 9.18 4.29 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Anagrams—Latency Total 0.13 0.72 0.73 0.99 1.06 0.31 0.02
  Elderberry 18.54 12.49 15.10 6.76 16.91 9.89 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 16.52 14.11 14.43 6.53 21.44 13.87 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
VPS—Total Correct 0.84 0.37 0.33 0.99 0.60 0.44 0.02
  Elderberry 2.73 2.20 3.22 2.22 3.25 2.19 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 2.46 1.85 3.00 2.00 3.27 2.05 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
VPS—Mean Latency Correct 0.77 0.38 2.11 0.15 3.33 0.07 * 0.06
  Elderberry 43.31 34.41 33.71 25.05 23.20 14.45 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  Placebo 31.73 42.74 35.79 31.26 41.42 34.78 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note. For MLM interaction terms, η2 was used to describe effect sizes [small (η2 = 0.01), medium (η2 = 0.06), and large (η2 = 0.14); [36,37]; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; HVLT = Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; FA = False Alarm; BNT = Boston Naming Test; REY CFT = Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; VPS = Visuospatial Problem Solving, # = Number. MLM models were also conducted with sex as a covariate. The sex covariate was non-significant, and results remained similar across all outcomes. Thus, it was not considered further, and results are presented without including sex in MLM models. * p < 0.10 (trending); *** p < 0.01