Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;14(4):476. doi: 10.3390/life14040476

Table 5.

Comparison of baseline characteristics and changes in visual and morphologic outcomes in patients who required switchback to aflibercept after switching to faricimab versus those who did not.

Switched Back Cases Others p-Value
(n = 5) (n = 38)
Age, years 77.0 (73.0–82.0) 80.0 (73.3–84.8) 0.622
Sex (female) 2 (40.0%) 14 (36.8%) 1.000
Subtype (PCV) 5 (100.0%) 24 (63.2%) 0.156
Lens (IOL) 3 (60.0%) 19 (50.0%) 1.000
History of PDT 4 (80.0%) 12 (31.6%) 0.056
Total no. of previous injections 27.0 (23.0–38.0) 34.5 (19.8–52.8) 0.733
Treatment interval, weeks 5.0 (5.0–5.0) 5.0 (4.0–6.0) 0.583
BCVA, logMAR 0.16 (−0.08–0.22) 0.13 (0.05–0.30) 0.746
Central retinal thickness, μm 340.0 (320.0–416.0) 283.5 (251.8–345.8) 0.099
Choroidal thickness, μm 127.0 (102.0–295.0) 161.0 (114.0–226.0) 0.880
Maximum PED, μm 202.0 (179.0–318.0) 190.5 (103.8–263.3) 0.405
Presence of SRH 0 (0.0%) 3 (7.9%) 1.000
Disrupted foveal ellipsoid zone 2 (40.0%) 19 (50.0%) 1.000

Continuous variables are presented as medians and quartile ranges. p-values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; IOL, intraocular lens; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PED, pigment epithelium detachment; SRH, subretinal hemorrhage.