Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 6;60(4):608. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040608

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author Year Type Main Outcome Country Patient (n) Cervical Cancer > 2 cm, n (% of total) Age
(Median)
Cao et al. [16] 2013 Prospective case-control To compare the surgical and pathologic characteristics, the prognosis, and fertility outcomes of the patients treated by
VRT or ART
China 150 48 (32) 30.0 (18–39)
De Vincenzo et al. [17] 2021 Prospective observational To evaluate the feasibility of NACT followed by CKC in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB2–IIA1 cervical cancer who desired to maintain fertility Italy 13 9 (69.2) 29 (23–36)
Deng et al. [18] 2016 Retrospective observational To evaluate the safety of SLNB-guided ART by observing surgical, oncologic, and fertility outcomes in patients who wished to preserve their fertility China 45 45 (100) 28.5 (19–40)
Guo et al. [19] 2018 Retrospective observational To compare the surgical and oncologic outcomes between ART and RH for stage IA2–IB1 cervical cancer China 329 75 (22.8) 31 (18–42)
Lanowska et al. [20] 2013 Retrospective observational To assess the oncologic and fertility outcomes of treatment in patients with cervical cancer of more than 2 cm seeking parenthood Germany 20 20 (100) 32 (26–41)
Li et al. [6] 2013 Retrospective observational To report the surgical and oncological safety of ART for selected patients with cervical cancer ≥2 cm in size China 133 62 (46.6) 30.4 (20–44)
Lintner et al. [21] 2013 Retrospective observational To report ART experience in patients with a cervical cancer more than 2 cm in diameter Hungary 45 45 (100) 32 (24–43)
Lu et al. [22] 2014 Retrospective observational To support the feasibility and safety of intra-arterial NACT followed by total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumor larger than 2 cm China 7 7 (100) 28 (22–35)
Marchiolè et al. [23] 2018 Retrospective observational To assess the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with early-stage large cervical cancers (2–5 cm) undergoing FST France 19 19 (100) 28.3 (21–37)
Plante et al. [24] 2006 Case series To present the cases of 3 young women with bulky stage IB1 cervical cancer treated with NACT followed by laparoscopic pelvic node dissection and VRT Canada 3 3 (100) 35 (26–36)
Rendòn et al. [25] 2020 Retrospective observational To report on the oncological and obstetrical outcomes of NACT followed by FST in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer ≥2 cm Colombia 25 25 (100) 27 (20–37)
Robova et al. [26] 2014 Prospective observational To assess oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density NACT and FST in cervical cancer Czech Republic 28 28 (100) 28.6 (15–34)
Salihi et al. [27] 2015 Retrospective observational To discuss the cases of 11 patients with cervical carcinoma stage IB treated with NACT followed by large cone resection Belgium 10 5 (50) 31.7 (25–36)
Tesfai et al. [28] 2015 Retrospective observational To assess the feasibility, safety, oncological, and obstetric outcomes in patients with cervical tumors >2 cm treated with NACT in preparation for ART Netherlands 19 19 (100) 28 (19–36)
Vercellino et al. [29] 2012 Prospective observational To assess the results of treatment of women with stage I cervical cancer >2 cm in diameter seeking fertility preservation Germany 18 6 (33.3) 31.3 (25–38)
Wethington et al. [8] 2016 Retrospective observational To report the author’s trachelectomy experience with cervical tumors measuring 2–4 cm United States 29 9 (31) 31 (22–40)
Zusterzeel et al. [30] 2020 Retrospective observational To evaluate the oncological and fertility outcomes of treatment in patients receiving an FST consisting of NACT followed by VRT Netherlands 18 14 (77.8) 29 (23–36)

VRT: vaginal radical trachelectomy; ART: abdominal radical trachelectomy; NACT: neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; CKC: cold-knife conization; SLNB: sentinel lymph node biopsy; RH: radical hysterectomy; FST: fertility-sparing treatment.