Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 18;17(2):426–447. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10425-2

Table 4.

Association between NETosis components and MACE in patients with ACS

Study Population Reporting of effect Endpoint and follow-up Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Unadjusted effect (95% CI) p-value Adjusted effect (95% CI) p-value
dsDNA
Langseth et al. (2020) [38] n = 956 patients with STEMI

2 Grouped by median

3Grouped by highest quartile vs. others

All-cause death and composite of death, MI, stroke, hospitalisation due to HF, or revascularisation > 3 months at median 4.6 years HR 3.36 (1.95–5.78)3; log rank2; 460 (407–508) vs. 411 (370–466) ng/mL, all-cause death < 0.0013; < 0.0012; < 0.001 HR 2.28 (1.19–4.36) 0.013
Log rank2; 429 (317–481) vs. 412 (372–466) ng/mL, MACE 0.0522; 0.255 HR 2.06 (1.08-3.93) 0.029
Helseth et al. (2019) [37] n = 251 STEMI patients treated with PCI Grouped by median Composite of all-cause mortality, MI, revascularisation ≥3 months, stroke, or hospitalisation due to HF at 1 year HR 5.9 (1.7–20.3) 0.005 HR 6.7 (1.9–23.2) 0.003
Wang et al. (2018) [55] n = 142 STEMI patients treated with PCI Grouped by ROC threshold All-cause and CV death & composite of death, ACS, PCI or CABG, or stroke at mean 24.5 months Log rank2, MACE 0.04 OR 7.43 (1.25–4.07), MACE 0.027
MPO-DNA
Hally et al. (2021) [41] n = 100 patients with MI

2 Grouped by median

§Median z-score

§§Median z-score with sP-selectin

Composite of CV death, non-fatal MI, or ischemic stroke at 1 year OR 1.13 (0.7–1.83)2; OR 1.28 (0.72–2.1)§; OR 1.86 (1.13–3.08)§§ 0.62; 0.33§; 0.015§§ No multivariate analysis
OR 1.94 (1.16–3.25)§§ 0.011
Langseth et al. (2020) [38] n = 956 patients with STEMI 2Grouped by median See Langseth et al. (2020) Log rank2; 0.167 (0.14–0.25) vs. 0.18 (0.14–0.26) OD, all-cause death 0.362; 0.91 No multivariate analysis
Log rank2; 0.17 (0.14–0.24) vs. 0.18 (0.14–0.27) OD, MACE 0.162; 0.33
Helseth et al. (2019) [37] n = 251 STEMI patients treated with PCI Grouped by median See Helseth et al. (2019) HR NR NS No multivariate analysis
NE-DNA
Hally et al. (2021) [41] n = 100 patients with MI Grouped by median See Hally et al. (2021) OR 1.06 (0.66–1.72) 0.81 No multivariate analysis
Citrullinated histone 3
Hally et al. (2021) [41] n = 100 patients with MI Grouped by median See Hally et al. (2021) OR 1.43 (0.89–2.33) 0.14 No multivariate analysis
Langseth et al. (2020) [38] n = 956 patients with STEMI 2 Grouped by median See Langseth et al. (2020) Log rank2; 10.25 (4.96–17.32) vs. 9.07 (4.83–17.24) ng/mL, all-cause death 0.0922; 0.6 No multivariate analysis
Log rank2; 92 (4.48–16.52) vs. 9.32 (4.91–17.30) ng/mL, MACE 0.882; 0.46

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BNP, brain natriuretic protein; BP, blood pressure; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; CitH3, citrullinated histone H3; H3(cit), see CitH3; CRP, C-reactive protein; cTnI, cardiac Troponin I; cTnT, cardiac Troponin T; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GOT, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, HF with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, HF with reduced ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio; hsCRP, high-sensitivity CRP; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; NE, neutrophil elastase; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; NR, not reported; NS, not significant (p < 0.05); OR, odds ratio; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; S, p-value is statistically significant (unspecified); SA, stable angina; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; WBC, white blood cell. Indicates a primary endpoint; indicates concentration is represented as median (IQR) or mean ± SD for cases vs. controls, respectively; 1denotes continuous variables assessed per unit change in concentration, as specified; 2denotes endpoints compared in patients stratified according to median biomarker concentration; 3denotes endpoints compared in patients stratified according to pre-specified categories of biomarker concentration. §Denotes effect size was calculated using the composite NET z-score (comprising z-scores of MPO-DNA% of NET standard, NE-DNA% of pooled serum standard and H3 (cit)% of NET standard) with platelet count; §§denotes effect parameter was calculated using composite NET z-score with platelet count and sP-selectin. Statistical significance was considered as two-tailed p ≤ 0.05 (bolded)