Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 26;14:9564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60381-3

Table 6.

Dissatisfaction indicator and dissatisfaction degree in drilling task.

Potential factors Indicator Perceived performance evaluation G Importance evaluation Z Difference G − Z P Dissatisfaction N
Physical environment Less dust 3.58 4.38  − 0.800 0.000 0.183
Good air quality 3.38 4.28  − 0.900 0.000 0.210
Bright light 3.50 4.58  − 1.075 0.000 0.236
Clean construction site 3.35 4.03  − 0.675 0.000 0.169
Convenient maintenance Sufficient vulnerable parts 3.65 4.45  − 0.800 0.000 0.180
Easy replacement of parts 3.58 4.08  − 0.500 0.001 0.123
Safety and health guarantee Sufficient protective materials 3.93 4.50  − 0.575 0.001 0.127
Injury report and timely treatment 4.23 4.65  − 0.425 0.008 0.090
Personnel organization efficiency Operation training 3.90 4.40  − 0.500 0.001 0.114
Clear assignment of tasks 3.98 4.40  − 0.425 0.003 0.095
Availability of spare tools Intact function and appearance 4.18 4.43  − 0.250 0.04 0.056
Equipment types sufficient 3.90 4.38  − 0.475 0.000 0.110
Man–tool matching Manual aided design 3.69 4.10  − 0.410 0.01 0.100

Means P < 0.05 indicates that the difference between G and Z is significant.