Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 6;5(3):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100290

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Data analysis of coronary artery disease

(A) Causal effect estimates by the six MVMR methods. The corresponding 95% confidence interval shown as vertical error bars.

(B) Causal effect estimates by UVMR approaches. The corresponding 95% confidence interval shown as vertical error bars. The radius of the confidence interval equals a× SE where a=Fχ21(10.05/8,1).

(C) Pleiotropy test where the x axis represents the linear predictor BˆθˆBEE and the y axis represents the standardized association between the IV and CAD from GWAS. The annotation of this pleiotropic variant is made if it is associated with the most significant exposures with p < 5E−8.

(D) Computation times of the comparing methods. Columns 1–8 represent computation time for UVMR of eight exposures and the last column represents computation time for MVMR.