Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 14;16(8):1170. doi: 10.3390/nu16081170

Table 4.

Summary of representative studies comparing different exercise intensities.

Reference Population Meal Exercise Protocols * Main Findings
Aadland and Høstmark (2008) [60] a 9 H (6 M and 3 F, 37.3 ± 12.2 years old) MM: 1 g of CHO per kg of BW. I: 9 on Borg’s RPE scale (very light intensity) vs. 11 on Borg’s RPE scale (light intensity)
Ti: Immediately after the meal
T: A (cycling)
D: 30 min
↓ with both intensities.
Shambrook et al. (2018) [62] a 10 H (10 M, 37.3 ± 7.3 years old) MM: 51 ± 12% CHO of EI. I: 35 ± 7% VO2R vs. 48 ± 8% VO2R vs. 10 × 1 min at 80% VO2R with 2 min of active recovery at 31 ± 12% VO2R
Ti: 30 min after the meal
T: A (cycling)
D: 30 min in total
↓ with all intensities.
Moreira et al. (2012) [69] a 10 H (10 M, 50.8 ± 12.0 years old) and 9 T2D (9 M, 47.2 ± 12.4 years old) MM: 45 g of CHO. I: 23% 1 RM vs. 46% 1 RM
Ti: 2 h after the meal
T: R
D: 25 min in total (3 × 30 reps or 3 × 16 reps)
↓ with R in both populations.
Achten and Jeukendrup (2003) [97] b 8 H (8 M, 26.4 ± 2.9 years old) OGTT (75 g of glucose). I: 40% vs. 65% vs. 80% Wmax
Ti: 45 min after the OGTT
T: A (cycling)
D: 20 min
↓ with all intensities.

Notes. *, protocols are reported as intensity (I), timing (Ti), type (T), and duration (D); a, data are reported as mean ± SD; b, data are reported as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations. H, healthy; M, male; F, female; MM, mixed meal; CHO, carbohydrates; BW, bodyweight; RPE, rate of perceived exertion; A, aerobic exercise; ↓, reductions in post-meal glycemia; VO2R, volume of oxygen uptake reserve; T2D, type 2 diabetes; 1 RM, one repetition maximum; R, resistance exercise; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; Wmax, maximal power output.