Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):135–155. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185877

Table 3.

PEDro methodological quality rating scores.

Study Criterion Total PEDro score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Aagaard et al. (2011) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Ben Brahim et al. (2021) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Blazevich and Jenkins (2002) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Born et al. (2020) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4
Büsch et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Carlsson et al. (2017) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Cherif et al. (2022) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Fernandez-Fernandez et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Hermassi et al. (2010) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Hermassi et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Hermassi et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6
Jones et al. (2018) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Karpiński et al. (2020) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Kristiansen et al. (2023) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Kristoffersen et al. (2019) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Losnegard et al. (2011) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4
McEvoy and Newton (1998) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Millet et al. (2002) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Newton and McEvoy (1994) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Newton et al. (1999) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Paavolainen et al. (1999) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4
Ramos Veliz et al. (2014) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Ramos Veliz et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Rønnestad et al. (2012) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4
Rønnestad et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Rønnestad et al. (2017) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Sabido et al. (2016) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Saez de Villarreal et al. (2014) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Saez de Villarreal et al. (2015a) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Saez de Villarreal et al. (2015b) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Saunders et al. (2006) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Sedano et al. (2009) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Sedano et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Therell et al. (2022) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Wang et al. (2022) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4

A detailed explanation of each item on the PEDro scale is available at https://pedro.org.au/english/resources/pedro-scale/.