Table 1.
Patient Selection for Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Hysterectomy
| Factors | Rationale | Preoperative evaluation | Surgical considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contraindications | |||
| Obliterated posterior cul-de-sac | • Inability to enter the peritoneal cavity that prevents inner-ring placement & ability to initiate laparoscopic part of vNOTES • Inability to see if the colon is adherent to the posterior uterus, which puts the patient at risk for bowel injury at the time of entry |
• Extensive history taking with a focus on pelvic pain & endometriosis symptoms • Obtaining the most accurate surgical history possible, including operative reports, hospitalization records & treatment history • Preoperative examination & examination under anesthesia at the beginning of the case with suspicion of uterosacral & rectovaginal nodularity, limited mobility & adhesions • Advanced imaging, such as MRI, protocoled for endometriosis or dynamic pelvic US performed by a sonologist |
• Conditions that might cause obliteration include endometriosis, severe PID, pelvic radiation & colorectal surgery such as low anterior resection • Best practice to address obliteration is to perform adhesiolysis via a transabdominal laparoscopic approach |
| Endometriosis | • Standard-of-care is to excise disease via transabdominal laparoscopic or robotic approach | • Extensive history taking with a focus on pelvic pain & endometriosis symptoms • Preoperative examination & examination under anesthesia at the beginning of the case with suspicion of uterosacral & rectovaginal nodularity, limited mobility & adhesions • Advanced imaging, such as MRI, protocoled for endometriosis or dynamic pelvic ultrasound performed by a sonologist |
• Robotic platforms & various surgical approaches are being investigated to be able to perform endometriosis excision, including sidewall & rectovaginal lesions; these techniques are not ready for widespread clinical adoption |
| Severe distortion of pelvic sidewall anatomy due to fibroids | • Cervical, lower uterine segment, broad ligament fibroids & fibroids extending into the sidewall prevent surgeon from visualizing uterine arteries at the site of the transection & limit ability to isolate them from sidewall • In cases of advanced pathology requiring extensive ureterolysis and sidewall dissection, transabdominal laparoscopic & robotic approaches are required |
• History suggestive of sidewall compression (asymmetric lymphedema & unilateral hip & pelvic floor pain) • Preoperative examination & examination under anesthesia indicating sidewall involvement with limited mobility & minimal space between fibroids in lower uterine segment & lateral sidewall • Advanced imaging, such as MRI, protocoled or dynamic pelvic US performed by a sonologist, close collaborative relationship with radiologists and sonologists & case-by-case treatment planning in a multidisciplinary setting |
• Need to be able to secure uterine blood supply by visualizing & transecting uterine arteries at the beginning of laparoscopic part • If able to secure uterine blood supply on 1 side, surgeon can detach entire side to rotate the uterus internally & obtain adequate exposure to transect uterine arteries on the contralateral more challenging side • Fibroids can be dissected out of the sidewall with adequate visualization of the ureter, vessels & all sidewall structures, but that depends on ability to see those structures, dissect & secure uterine arteries, and on surgeon's skill set |
| Indications | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| AUB |
• Benefits of vaginal route |
• Follow standard evaluation protocols |
• Contained tissue extraction is an option in case of enlarged uterus & suspicion for hyperplasia |
| Fibroids |
• Benefits of vaginal route • “Ideal” fibroid distribution would be such that the cervix & lower uterine segment are not involved & the uterus has a shape of a “mushroom”—narrow where uterine blood supply comes in with adequate lateral sidewall access that, in turn, would enable surgeon to secure the uterine blood supply |
• History suggestive of sidewall compression (asymmetric lymphedema & unilateral hip & pelvic floor pain) • Preoperative examination & examination under anesthesia indicating sidewall involvement with limited mobility & minimal space between fibroids in the lower uterine segment & lateral sidewall • If sidewall involvement is suspected, advanced imaging, such as MRI, protocoled or dynamic pelvic US performed by a sinologist should be considered; close collaborative relationship with radiologists & sonologists & case-by-case treatment planning in a multidisciplinary setting |
• No “size” cutoff exists clinically as long as physical examination & imaging are consistent with the ability to access uterine blood supply • Uterus can be rotated in the pelvis sequentially into a more favorable orientation to improve exposure as hysterectomy proceeds (example: 1 “easier” side of the hysterectomy can be completed first to gain access to the more-difficult side) • All blood supply is secured before specimen extraction begins; this decreases blood loss |
| Adenomyosis | • Benefits of vaginal route | • Extensive history taking with a focus on pelvic pain & endometriosis symptoms • Preoperative examination & examination under anesthesia at the beginning of the case with suspicion of uterosacral & rectovaginal nodularity, limited mobility & adhesions • Advanced imaging, such as MRI, protocoled for endometriosis or dynamic pelvic US performed by a sonologist |
• If clinically suspicious of comorbid endometriosis, transabdominal approach is standard-of-care to perform endometriosis excision at the time of hysterectomy |
| Patient factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| C-section(s) scar |
• Adhesiolysis can be started during vaginal part & completed during laparoscopic part |
• Preoperative examination enables surgeon access to extent of adhesions |
• Laparoscopic portion of vNOTES adhesiolysis enables surgeon to reach further cephalad & perform more extensive manipulation, compared to conventional vaginal route, enabling surgeon to address more extensive adhesions & convert transabdominal cases to vNOTES route • Inner ring is placed between the colpotomy incision on the vaginal epithelium & C-section scar adhesions and peritoneum • Using “lateral-to-medial” technique by securing uterine blood supply first, then lysing adhesions from lateral–to–medial to reflect ureters, minimize bleeding & decrease bladder injury risk • Anterior peritoneum is blue or gray because it's translucent, unlike the dense white scar; also, peritoneum moves in & out slightly from intermittent insufflation of pneumoperitoneum or patient ventilation, showing “wave” or the “sail” sign • Can retrograde fill the bladder, but that is rarely necessary due to “upside down” view of bladder, which is retracted by the inner ring |
| Abdominal wall mesh from prior surgery |
Mesh avoidance |
• Preoperative evaluation, including prior operative reports & imaging |
• Vaginal route enables surgeon to avoid having to place ports & navigate around the mesh or having to cut through it |
| Adhesions in the mid-& upper-abdomen, multiple prior abdominal surgeries |
Avoid adhesiolysis |
• Preoperative evaluation, including prior operative reports |
• Vaginal route enables surgeon avoid having to place ports & navigate around the adhesions &/or having to perform extensive adhesiolysis |
| Rigid abdomen, resulting in limited insufflation (nulliparity, abdominoplasty) |
• Benefits of vaginal route |
— |
• Low pressures (8–10 mm Hg) are sufficient for visualization, because most of the surgical work occurs in the pelvis, which is a rigid bony structure & does not need to be insufflated to the same pressures as the transabdominal approach to obtain adequate visualization • Laparotomy pad or 4 x 4 sponge inserted into the pelvis at the beginning of the case helps bowel retraction and visualization |
| Limited vaginal access |
Conditions that contribute to narrow introitus & vaginal canal (examples: obesity, nulliparity, postmenopausal status & gender-affirming surgery) limit ability to perform conventional vaginal hysterectomy |
— |
• Compared to conventional vaginal hysterectomy, in which limited access may preclude ability to complete entire case, with vNOTES, surgeon only needs to be able to perform colpotomies & place vNOTES port, to complete procedure laparoscopically • Improved access enables the surgeon to convert transabdominal cases to the vNOTES route • For obese patients, vNOTES bypasses challenges of addressing abdominal fat, enables shortest distance to target anatomy & requires less Trendelenburg positioning, as laparotomy pads can be used to move intestines out of the surgical field & lower insufflation pressures |
| Cosmesis | • Avoidance of abdominal incisions is integral part of patient-centered care, wherein patient preference is considered | • Special consideration for gender-affirming hysterectomies wherein abdominal incisions could worsen gender dysphoria | |
vNOTES, vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; AUB, abnormal uterine bleeding; C-section, cesarean section.