Table 1. General rules for presentation design for early career researchers.
Do's | Don'ts | ||
---|---|---|---|
General
rules |
Font/
background |
-Sans serif (Arial, Helvetica, Franklin Gothe)
-Caps in headings -Appropriate size -Font/Background contrast |
-Serif (Times New Roman, Georgia, Rockwell)
-Caps in paragraphs -12 pt cannot be read even in the first row -Dark colored background |
Figures | -Strongly recommended
-High quality -Self-designed or cited |
-Blurred and low-quality
-Plagiarism -Overcomplicated |
|
Tables | -Only if necessary
-Easy to follow |
-Too many tables
-Do not emphasize the point |
|
Graphs | -Choose the right type
-The data can be followed by non-expert -Legends are not necessary -Name the graph properly -Proper scaling |
-Overloaded graphs
-Too many decimals and unrecognizable symbols -Multiple graphs indifferent styles |
|
Specific
rules |
Presentation | -Number of slides: one minute per slide
-Visible to everyone -The research topic, name, and surname of the presenter and date must be stated at the beginning -two-three sentences on each slide (bullet points) |
-Long illegible paragraphs
-Take-home messages not included |
Poster | -Follow dimensions defined by the congress organizer
-Use maximum dimensions allowed, for visibility and prominence -Title and general layout should be visible from three meters -A balance between text and figures -QR code could be included |
-The dimension and orientation of the poster
─ portrait or landscape ─ were not taken into account -Too much text = a newspaper article -Too many figures = unscientific poster |