Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Proc Conf Assoc Comput Linguist Meet. 2023 Jul;2023:10520–10542. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.587

Table 3:

Methods to create negative and positive candidates in support of relevance and faithfulness calibration, respectively. For each candidate generation method, we include whether it is used as a positive or negative example (both in the case of relevance ranking), what inputs it requires (the source document and/or the reference (ref.)), as well as the external components needed and, finally, the specific models used for the experiments in this paper.

Method + Source Ref. External Components Models Used
Relevance Calibration Diverse Beam Summarization Model PRIMERA
Diverse Beam Summarization Model LongT5
Faithful Calibration Mask-And-Fill Constituency Parser, PLM Stanza, SciFive
Entity Swap Entity, Number Extractors BERN2, Quantulum
Paraphrase Paraphrase Generator GPT-3 + Curated Prompt
Reference N/A N/A