Table 1.
Articles for Assessment of Severe Enduring Anorexia Nervosa (SE-AN) criteria
| Reference | Overview | Title | Mean BMI kg/m2 (SD) | Duration years | Previous treatment history | Other Measure of Severity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | [36] Ambwani et al., 2020 | Retrospective study- Patients grouped into early stage and SE-AN | A multicenter audit of outpatient care for adult anorexia nervosa: Symptom trajectory, service use, and evidence in support of “early stage” versus “severe and enduring” classification. | Of SE-AN group:15.95 (1.27) | Defined for SE-AN Group ≥ 7 | Patients in the SE-AN group had been hospitalized more often than those in the early-stage group | Defined for SE-AN group: Severity of psychological distress (DASS-total ≥ 60) |
| 2. | [62] Bemer et al., 2021 | Retrospective study-BMD in “extremely malnourished” “extremely severe” female inpatients with AN | Bone mineral density at extremely low weight in patients with anorexia nervosa |
Excluded if BMI ≥ 16 Of participants: 12.60 ± 1.60 |
Of participants:11.10 ± 10.40 | Not reported | Assessed BMD but did not use this to define severity of AN. |
| 3. | [58] Bianchi et al., 2021 | Position paper presenting “harm reduction” approach in SE-AN | The Ethical Defensibility of Harm Reduction and Eating Disorders | Refers to hypothetical patient with SE-AN as having a BMI of 14 | Definition: ≥6 | Not reported for defining SE-AN | Not reported for defining SE-AN. Emphasis on improving quality of life. |
| 4. | [21] Broomfield et al., 2017 | PRISMA literature review with the goal of better defining criteria for SE-AN. | Labeling and defining severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and critical analysis | Range in included studies:13.31–19.80 | Range in included studies:2.88–20.4 | Studies including criteria for previous failed treatment attempt(s) | Measures indicative of significant impairment of quality of life, psychological and/or social. |
| 5. | [34] Broomfield et al., 2021 | Expert panel study to better define “later stage AN” | Establishing consensus for labeling and defining the later stage of anorexia nervosa: A Delphi study | Participants consensus that duration of illness, quality of life and unsuccessful attempts at evidence-based treatment are important to include in a universal definition of illness | |||
| 6. | [115] Calabrese et al., 2022 | Clinical trial evaluating effectiveness of ketamine and a ketogenic diet on weight recovered participants with persistent eating disorder psychopathy. | Ketogenic diet and ketamine infusion treatment to target chronic persistent eating disorder psychopathology in anorexia nervosa: a pilot study | All considered “weight restored” | Inclusion criteria > 10 | Not reported | All considered “weight restored” but with ongoing severe AN-related preoccupations |
| 7. | [43] Calugi et al., 2017 | Study evaluating outcomes of those with SE-AN and those with AN, but not SE-AN | Intensive enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: A longitudinal outcome study |
Defined Severe (BMI 15-15.99) Defined Extreme (BMI < 15) For SE-AN group: 15.2 (2.0) |
Definition for SE-AN group > 7 Participants in SE-AN group 12.3 (4.7) |
84.4% of SEAN group noted recent treatment failure | EDE, EDE-12, GSI |
| 8. | [45] Dalton et al., 2022 | Clinical trial of rTMS effectiveness for SE-AN | My dad was like “it’s your brain, what are you doing?“’: Participant experiences of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in severe enduring anorexia nervosa. | Inclusion criteria > 14 |
Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥3 Participants: 15.05 ±11.33 |
Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥ 1 NICE-2017 recommended day or inpatient treatment. Participants: Number of previous hospitalizations 2.31±1.95 Mean duration of previous hospital stays in months 11.56 ±12.02 |
Various tools used though not to define SE-AN |
| 9. | [46] Dalton et al., 2018 | Clinical trial of rTMS effectiveness for SE-AN | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study |
Inclusion criteria > 14 Participants: 16 (1.44) |
Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥3 Participants: 14.07 (10.75) |
Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥ 1 NICE-2017 recommended day or inpatient treatment. Participants: Number of previous hospitalizations 2.18 (1.91) Mean duration of previous hospital stays in months 10.49 (11.66) |
Various tools used though not to define SE-AN |
| 10. | [47] Dalton, Foerde, et al., 2020 | Clinical trial of rTMS effectiveness for SE-AN | The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food choice-related self-control in patients with severe, enduring anorexia nervosa. |
Inclusion criteria > 14 Participants: 15.90 ± 1.40 |
Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥3 | Defining Inclusion criteria: ≥ 1 NICE-2017 recommended day or inpatient treatment. | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 11. | [48] Dalton, Lewis, et al., 2020 | Clinical trial of rTMS effectiveness for SE-AN (follow-up) | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in severe, enduring anorexia nervosa: An open longer-term follow-up | See Dalton 2018 | See Dalton 2018 | See Dalton 2018 | See Dalton 2018 |
| 12. | [37] Fernandes Arroteia et al., 2020 | Case report “severe” “chronic” AN response to Deep brain stimulation | Impressive weight gain after deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens in treatment-resistant bulimic anorexia nervosa | Participant: 12.8 | Participant:26 | “The patient has participated in various psychiatric therapies, including behavioural therapy” | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 13. | [116] Forbes, 2020 | Opinion piece on withdrawal of care for adolescents with “severe anorexia” | Futility in adolescent anorexia nervosa and the question of withdrawal of care | Not included | Refers to > 7, though points out this cannot be applied for adolescents. | Not included | Not included |
| 14. | [54] González Macías et al., 2021 | Case report of intervention for SE-AN. | Group family psychotherapy during relapse. Case report of a novel intervention for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa |
Participant: 16.0 No defining criteria for SEAN used |
Participant:11 No defining criteria for SEAN used though “chronicity” noted as defining |
Participant: None specifically for eating disorders No defining criteria for SEAN used though “treatment failure” noted as defining |
Participant: Vomiting of 70 a week, compulsive exercise, self-injuries, risk behaviors |
| 15. | [117] Guinhut et al., 2021 | Study evaluating mortality for patient admitted to a specialized clinical nutrition unit for “extremely severe malnutrition” | Five-year mortality of severely malnourished patients with chronic anorexia nervosa admitted to a medical unit |
Defining: <13 Participants: 12.7 (± 2.2) |
Participants:9.8 ± 9.3 | Participants: 2.9 ± 3.4 | Various tools used though not to define SE-AN |
| 16. | [22] Hay & Touyz, 2018 | Editorial on defining SEAN | Classification challenges in the field of eating disorders: can severe and enduring anorexia nervosa be better defined? | Defining criteria: “underweight” |
Notes that long duration is one criterion for SE-AN Agreed lower limit 3 |
Defining criteria: “Exposure to at least two evidence-based treatments appropriately delivered together with (an appropriate) diagnostic assessment” |
Defining criteria: “A persistent state of dietary restriction, and overvaluation of weight/shape with functional impairment” |
| 17. | [55] Hemmingsen et al., 2020 | Case report of cognitive performance patient with “chronic” AN and “extremely low BMI” | Case report: cognitive performance in an extreme case of anorexia nervosa with a body mass index of 7.7 | Participant: 7.2 | Patient: 25 | Patient: Repeated hospitalizations in treatment facilities specializing in eating disorders. | Various tools used though not to define SE-AN |
| 18. | [57] Herpertz-Dahlmann, 2020 | Commentary on detecting risk of developing “serious and enduring” AN | Serious and enduring anorexia nervosa from a developmental point of view: How to detect potential risks at an early stage and prevent chronic illness? | Not reported | Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018: >3 | Refers to Hay & Touyz et al., 2018: Exposure to at least two evidence-based treatments | Not reported |
| 19. | [118] Israely et al., 2017 | Clinical trial evaluating effectiveness of tyrosine in “severe hospitalized” AN patients | A Double-Blind, Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Tyrosine Treatment on Cognitive Function and Psychological Parameters in Severe Hospitalized Anorexia Nervosa Patients | Participants: 15.5 (1.6) | Participants: 6.3 (4.9) | Participants: Number of prior hospitalizations 1.4 (0.7) | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 20. | [50] Johansson et al., 2022 | Study evaluating polygenic risk association with severity and outcome for “severe and enduring eating disorders” | Polygenic association with severity and long-term outcome in eating disorder cases |
Participants: 15.91 (1.39) AN-R Participants: 16.52 (1.49) AN-BP |
Follow-up time (difference in years between year at first registration and year when recontacted for recruitment) ≥ 5 years | Treatment resistance noted as important and as such all participants had undergone at least one treatment attempt | SEED definition: CIA score ≥ 18 and a follow-up time ≥ 5 years (i.e., years between initial registration and ANGI recruitment) |
| 21. | [49] Knyahnytska et al., 2019 | Study evaluating feasibility and safety of insula dTMS in those with SE-AN | Insula H-coil deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SEAN): A pilot study | Participants: 16.6 ± 0.9 | Definition of treatment resistance: >5 | Definition of treatment resistance: Failure to respond to at least 2 trials of intensive treatment interventions | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 22. | [59] Marzola et al., 2021 | Study attempting to determine profiles for those with AN of varying duration. Those with LD-AN, have more previous unsuccessful treatment attempts, and lower lifetime BMI. Did not impact treatment response. | Inpatients with severe- enduring anorexia nervosa: Understanding the “enduringness” specifier |
Participant in long duration group: At baseline 14.3 (2.1) Lowest lifetime 12.8 (1.9) |
Long duration defined as ≥ 7 |
Participant in long duration group: Number of previous hospitalizations 2.6 (3.2) SD |
Numerous assessments were conducted but none allowing for a clear definition of SEAN from non-SEAN AN |
| 23. | [119] Mishima et al., 2021 | Study using MRI to evaluate structural brain changes in those with SE-AN. | Structural brain changes in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study of gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter integrity. | Participants: 14.2 (2.5) | Participants: 15.7 (9.0) | Not reported | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 24. | [51] Oudijn et al., 2021 | Study evaluating DBS in those with “treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa” | Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the capsula interna in patients with treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. | Inclusion criteria: <15 | Inclusion criteria: ≥10 | Inclusion criteria: “Lack of response to ≥2 typical modes of treatment including ≥1 inpatient treatment of hospitalization” | Inclusion criteria: GAF score ≤45 for ≥2 years |
| 25. | [64] Park et al., 2018 | Study evaluating feasibility and efficacy of DBS in those with SE-AN |
Study Protocol: Using Deep- Brain Stimulation, Multimodal Neuroimaging and Neuroethics to Understand and Treat Severe Enduring Anorexia Nervosa |
Inclusion criteria: >13, < 16 | Inclusion criteria: >7 |
Inclusion criteria: “lack of response to two or more typical modes of treatment, such as inpatient weight restoration, psychotherapy and psychopharmacology” |
Inclusion criteria: Disabling severity with substantial functional impairment1 |
| 26. | [52] Pérez et al., 2022 | Study evaluating efficacy of DBS in those with SE-AN. | Cognitive and quality-of-life related factors of body mass index (BMI) improvement after deep brain stimulation in the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in treatment-refractory chronic anorexia nervosa | Inclusion criteria: >13, < 15.99 (participants outside this range could participate if meeting other criteria) | Inclusion criteria: ≥10 | Inclusion criteria: Lack of response to ≥3 voluntary intensive treatments or clinical worsening and unwillingness to receive further treatment, including hospital admissions for involuntary feeding. | Various tools used, though not to define SE-AN |
| 27. | [35] Raykos et al., 2018 | Study examining whether AN duration or severity impacts response to cognitive behavioral therapy. Study found that they did not. | Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa? Illness severity and duration are unrelated to outcomes from cognitive behaviour therapy. | Participants: 16.8 (1.5) |
Participants:5 [3 low, 12 high] Grouped into 3-, 7- and 11-year illness duration for assessment. |
Participants: 91.8% and 55.2% had a history of psychological treatment and psychiatric hospitalizations, respectively. |
Noted “the severity of problematic eating disorder attitudes and cognitions at pretreatment (had) no impact on the amount of change in BMI during the early phase of treatment.” |
| 28. | [120] Russell et al., 2019 | Literature review on “harm reduction” approach in SE-AN | Harm minimization in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa. | Does not propose criteria | Does not propose criteria | Does not propose criteria | Does not propose criteria |
| 29. | [53] Scaife et al., 2022 | Study evaluating efficacy of DBS in those with SE-AN | Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in severe enduring anorexia nervosa: A pilot study. | Inclusion criteria:>13, < 16 | Inclusion criteria:>7 | Inclusion criteria: ≥3 voluntary intensive treatments (partial or full hospitalization) and ≥2 trials of psychological treatment | Various tools used though not to define SE-AN |
| 30. | [70] Smith & Woodside, 2020 | Retrospective study of data from inpatient eating disorder treatment facility to compare characteristics of patients with multiple admissions to those with good outcomes | Characterizing Treatment-Resistant Anorexia Nervosa | Participants in treatment- resistant group: 14.36 [13.56 low, 15.60 high] | Participants in treatment-resistant group: 6.84 [low 2.62, 12.32 high] | Treatment-resistant defined as two or more incomplete inpatient admissions and no complete admissions | Participants in treatment- resistant group: EDEQ 5.29 [low 4.76, high 5.59] and BDI: 46.00 [low 34.00, high 53.00] |
| 31. | [121] Strand et al., 2020 | Review paper providing background on palliative care for SE-AN. | A palliative care approach in psychiatry: Clinical implications | “More or less permanent low BMI” |
“Longstanding Illness” |
“Numerous treatment episodes have not resulted in any lasting remission” | “Patient who has ‘tried everything’ without success” |
| 32. | [33] Sun et al., 2015 | Chapter reviewing neurosurgical treatments for psychiatric conditions, including SEAN | Surgical treatments for anorexia nervosa |
Participants weight must be < 85% of ideal body weight (and/or BMI < 17.5) |
DSM-IV criterion C, and GAF ≤45 or less for at least 2 years | Participants must have been treated with an appropriate therapy for more than 3 years. At least two types of therapy must have been applied with no response. |
“Must have experienced a rapid decrease in body weight over a short time period, which could be life-threatening without effective intervention” |
| 33. | [122] Tumba et al., 2023 | Perspective paper presenting the difficulties of SEAN cases, the harm reduction approach and physician-assisted suicide. | Clinical and Ethical Dilemmas in the Involuntary Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa | Definition: 13–14 | Definition: 6–12 | Not included | Definition: “Have decreased likelihood of remission, have acquired various physical consequences of prolonged disordered eating, potassium (3.0 mmol/L); persistent risk of acute medical decompensation and need for hospitalization.” |
| 34. | [44] Voderholzer et al., 2018 | Case study of “chronically ill” participant with “extreme” AN | 3-year course after successful therapy of extreme anorexia nervosa | Participant: 8.5 | Participant: 7 | Participant: 3 prior inpatient stays in eating disorder specialty clinics | Participant: Extreme urge to move |
| 35. | [56] Westermair et al., 2020 | Perspective paper presenting palliative care for SE-AN | A palliative approach for severest anorexia nervosa? | Criteria for palliative care: Extremely low BMI (e.g. <13 kg/m2 | Criteria for palliative care long duration of illness (e.g. 10 years) | Criteria for palliative care: High number of inpatient admissions and coercive measures without sustained symptom reduction (e.g.,>3) |
Criteria for palliative care: Pronounced purging behavior. Psychiatric comorbidities Somatic comorbidities Unwillingness to change, identification with/pride in the disease |
| 36. | [60] Wildes et al., 2017 | Study on developing an empirically based definition of SE-AN | Characterizing severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: An empirical approach | Noted: “patients with AN could be grouped into higher and lower severity profiles that differed with respect to eating disorder behaviors and quality-of-life, as well as several external validators including age, weight concerns, and lifetime mood and anxiety comorbidity. Moreover, within each severity profile, there was dimensional variability in eating disorder behavior, quality-of-life, and indicators of chronicity (i.e., illness duration, repeated bouts of hospital treatment, and low BMI)”. | |||
| 37. | [20] (Wonderlich et al., 2020 | Review of historical issues in diagnosing SE-AN as well as novel treatments and clinical perspectives | Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: Update and observations about the current clinical reality. | Refers to Hays 2018 proposed criteria: “underweight” | Refers to Hay 2018 proposed criteria: >3 | Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018 proposed criteria: “Exposure to at least two evidence-based treatments appropriately delivered together with (an appropriate) diagnostic assessment” |
Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018 proposed criteria: “A persistent state of dietary restriction, and overvaluation of weight/shape with functional impairment” |
| 38. | [69] Zhu et al., 2020 | Review of psychological treatments for those with SE-AN | Psychological treatments for people with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: A mini review | Refers to Hay 2018 proposed criteria: “underweight” | Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018 proposed criteria: >3 | Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018 proposed criteria: “Exposure to at least two evidence-based treatments appropriately delivered together with (an appropriate) diagnostic assessment” |
Refers to Hay & Touyz, 2018 proposed criteria: “A persistent state of dietary restriction, and overvaluation of weight/shape with functional impairment” |
AN-R- Anorexia Nervosa-Restricting type; AN-BP- Anorexia Nervosa Binge Purge type; BDI-Beck Depression Inventory; BMD-Bone Mineral density; BMI-Body Mass Index; CIA- Clinical Impairment Scale; DASS-Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales; EDE- Eating Disorder Examination; GAF-Global Assessment of Function; GSI- Global Severity Index; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; NA-Not Applicable (and/or provided); NICE-National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; rTMS- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; SE-AN- Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa; SD-Standard Deviation