Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 27;37(5):doae005. doi: 10.1093/dote/doae005

Table 3. Characteristics of studies evaluating the use of nitrates in achalasia.

Study Design Sample size (n) Previous achalasia treatment (n, %) Drug (+/−formulation) Significant reduction in LOS pressure Symptomatic improvement (n, %) Effect on pain Side effects  
(n, %)
Intolerable side effects  (n, %) Follow-up
Gelfond 198117 Clinical trial 24 8 (33) ISDN SL Yes (65.9%) 19 (79) NR 8 (33) 0 (0) 2–19 months
Gelfond 198212 RCT 15 3 (20) ISDN SL Yes (63.5%) 13 (87) NR 6 (40) 2 (13) 5–14 months
Ghosh 199413 RCS 30 NR ISDN SL NR Unclear NR NR NR N/A
Rozen 198218 Clinical trial 15 3 (20) ISDN SL Yes (49.6%) 9 (60) NR 2 (13) 2 (13) 12 months (mean)
Wong 198719 RCT 15 0 (0) Nitroglycerin SL Yes NR NR NR NR 30 minutes

ISDN, isosorbide dinitrate; LOS, lower esophageal sphincter; N/A, not applicable; NR, not reported; RCS, retrospective case series; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SL, sublingual.

Five patients received nitrates. The study retrospectively examined 30 patients who had undergone pneumatic balloon dilatation.

Of group two patients (24–65 years old), five responded to pharmacological treatment, but it is not stated whether this was after nitrates or nifedipine. No patients >65 years old responded to pharmacological treatment. All patients required pneumatic dilatation.