Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;33(5):681–693. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1293

Table 2.

Machine learning performance of various lipid panels.

10-Lipid panel training set 10-Lipid panel test set 17-Lipid panel training set 17-Lipid panel test set AutoML 17-lipid panel test set
OC: n = 144, Non-OC: n = 144 OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34 OC: n = 144, Non-OC: n = 144 OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34 OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34
AUC 0.85 ± 0.07 0.82 0.88 ± 0.07 0.83 0.85
Accuracy 0.77 ± 0.09 0.78 0.81 ± 0.09 0.76 0.78
Sensitivity 0.78 ± 0.15 0.78 0.83 ± 0.09 0.75 0.75
Specificity 0.76 ± 0.12 0.76 0.79 ± 0.12 0.76 0.82

Note: Classification performance using a random forest classier and the AutoML model. The top 7 discriminant gangliosides were added to the 10-lipid panel to create the 17-lipid biomarker panel. Training data were balanced with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE).