Table 2.
Machine learning performance of various lipid panels.
| 10-Lipid panel training set | 10-Lipid panel test set | 17-Lipid panel training set | 17-Lipid panel test set | AutoML 17-lipid panel test set | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OC: n = 144, Non-OC: n = 144 | OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34 | OC: n = 144, Non-OC: n = 144 | OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34 | OC: n = 64, Non-OC: n = 34 | |
| AUC | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.82 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| Accuracy | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.78 | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
| Sensitivity | 0.78 ± 0.15 | 0.78 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Specificity | 0.76 ± 0.12 | 0.76 | 0.79 ± 0.12 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
Note: Classification performance using a random forest classier and the AutoML model. The top 7 discriminant gangliosides were added to the 10-lipid panel to create the 17-lipid biomarker panel. Training data were balanced with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE).