Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 23;37:348–377. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.033

Table 1.

Comparison of different 4D bioprinting technologies.


4D bioprinting technologies
MEB Inkjet SLA DLP LAB
Ink/bioink viscosity 1 to > 107 mPa s [56,57] 3–30 mPa s [52] 3–300 mPa s [58,59] 1–200 mPa s [60,61] 1–300 mPa s [62,63]
Cell density 108 cells/ml, cell spheroids, organoids [49,51,64,65] 106 cells/ml [66,67] > 106 cells/ml [68,69] 106 to108 cells/ml [61,70] 108 cells/ml [62]
Cell viability 70–95% [37,71] >85% [67,72,73] >75% [68,69] >75% [74] >85% [63,75]
Nozzle diameter 200 μm to mm scale 20–150 μm Nozzle free Nozzle free Nozzle free
Resolution 200 μm to mm scale 50–300 μm 20–80 μm <150 μm <150 μm
Printing speed Slow Fast Medium to fast Fast Slow
Typical materials Shape memory polymers, hydrogels, and composites (e.g., AlgMA [37,40], MC/alginate [42,76], cellulose nanofiber/NIPAM [35]) Hydrogels (e.g., GelMA [73]) Photopolymers (e.g., soybean oil epoxidized acrylate [77]) Photopolymers (e.g., silk fibroin [70], GelMA/PEGDA [74]) Hydrogels (e.g., collagen [75])
External stimuli Humidity [37,40], heat [78,79], and light [80,81] Humidity [82] Humidity, temperature [77] Humidity [70,74] Patterned fibroblasts [75]

Abbreviation: AlgMA, methacrylate alginate; MC, methylcellulose; NIPAM, N-isopropylacrylamide; GelMA, gelatin methacryloyl; PEGDA, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate.