Skip to main content
. 2024 May 1;385:e078084. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078084

Table 5.

Metaregression analyses to explore potential causes of heterogeneity among included studies

Factor Outcome Effect of factor on outcome Adjusted R2 (%)
Participants with past use of psychedelics (%) Change in depression scores Significant (P=0.002)—each percentage point increase in past psychedelic use was associated with an increase of 4.2 points in depression score change 38.9
Participants with past use of psychedelics (%) Response rate Significant (P=0.006)—each percentage increase point increase in past psychedelic use was associated with an increase of 4.4 points in response rates 93.8
Participants with previous use of psychedelics (%) Remission rate Non-significant (P=0.15) NA
Female participants (%) Change in depression scores Non-significant (P=0.41) NA
Female participants (%) Response rate Non-significant (P=0.71) NA
Female participants (%) Remission rate Non-significant (P=0.78) NA
Average participant’s age Change in depression scores Significant (P<0.001)—each year increase in age was associated with a 0.16 increase in depression score change 48.5
Average participant’s age Response rate Non-significant (P=0.12) NA
Average participant’s age Remission rate Non-significant (P=0.78) NA

NA=not applicable.